ArticleWorld journal of urology2026
Flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath combined with flexible ureteroscopy for proximal impacted ureter stones: a retrospective case series.
Article in World journal of urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the technical feasibility and clinical outcomes of flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath (FANS) combined with flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) for proximal impacted ureter stones (PIUS) and identify predictors of residual fragments (RF).
methodsThis single-center retrospective study included 45 patients with PIUS who underwent FANS-fURS (August 2023-February 2025). The surgical procedure involved FANS deployment, laser lithotripsy, and real-time suction-assisted fragment clearance. Stone-free status (SFS) was assessed at 30 days postoperatively, with Grades B-D defined as RF. Multivariate logistic regression analyzed predictors of RF.
resultsThe median age was 55 years (IQR: 41.5-61.5), with 71.1% male. Postoperative SFS were Grade A (40.00%), B (51.11%), C (6.67%), and D (2.22%). Multivariate analysis identified larger sheath size as protective against RF (OR: 0.061, P = 0.025), while larger stone diameter (OR: 1.593, P = 0.031) and higher polyp occupancy within the lumen (OR: 1.919, P = 0.040) increased RF risk. Median operative time was 42 min (IQR: 33.5-65.0).
conclusionThe combination of FANS and fURS demonstrated high efficacy in managing PIUS, achieving favorable stone clearance rates. Sheath size, stone diameter, and polyp occupancy within the lumen are significant predictors of RF, which can help optimize surgical strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42068334What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.