ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2026
Inferring Local Protein Structural Similarity from Sequence Alone.
Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Detecting structural similarity at the local level between proteins is central to understanding function and evolution, yet most approaches require 3D models. In this work, we show that protein language models (pLMs), solely using sequence data as input, implicitly capture fine-grained structural signals that can be leveraged to identify such similarities. By mean-pooling residue embeddings over sliding windows and comparing them across proteins with cosine similarity, we find diagonal patterns that reflect locally aligned regions, even without sequence identity. Building on this insight, we introduce a framework for detecting locally aligned structural regions directly from sequences, supporting the development of scalable methods for structural annotation and comparison. The effectiveness and scalability of this framework are further demonstrated through a case study identifying SRC homology 3 (SH3) domains within a large-scale PDB subset, where our approach successfully recovered structurally conserved motifs across diverse sequence contexts. Ultimately, this work provides a lightweight alternative to structure-based methods, paving the way for high-throughput structural discovery using sequence data alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.