ArticleTechnology in cancer research & treatment
A Call for a Collaborative Framework for Automation in Adaptive Radiotherapy.
Article in Technology in cancer research & treatment. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Automated planning architectures for online adaptive radiotherapy: A narrative review of the ethos and unity/Monaco platforms.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adaptive radiotherapy (ART) has been shown to improve geometric and dosimetric accuracy, with emerging evidence for clinical benefit, but it remains resource-intensive and lacks scalability. This limitation arises from multiple factors, including the complexity of current systems, the closed and proprietary nature of radiotherapy platforms, and the need for human oversight driven in part by clinical risk considerations. Historically, major advances in radiotherapy-from Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) and Image-Guided Radiation Therapy (IGRT) to Magnetic Resonance-guided Radiotherapy (MRgRT) and Deep Learning in Radiotherapy (DLinRT) (particularly for auto-contouring)-have thrived through open collaboration and transparency. The community can accelerate ART innovation by returning to this model. Open-source initiatives such as Computational Environment for Radiotherapy Research (CERR), Open Knowledge-based Planning (OpenKBP), and matRad demonstrate how shared tools and methods improve reproducibility and drive scientific progress. The next critical step is to develop collaborative, structured frameworks that enable safe, secure interaction between academic and vendor systems-safeguarding intellectual property while fostering co-development and validation. Through structured transparency and shared accountability, the radiotherapy field can transform automation from a closed, non-transparent architecture into a collective learning ecosystem, ultimately extending the life-saving benefits of ART to more patients worldwide through openness, trust, and collective innovation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.