ArticleThe FEBS journal2026
Toward understanding the catalytic mechanism for two classes of bacterial phospholipid N-methyltransferases.
Article in The FEBS journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Phosphatidylcholine (PC), the predominant phospholipid in eukaryotic membranes, also plays a crucial role in certain bacterial species, often mediating interactions with eukaryotic hosts. In bacteria, a major pathway for PC biosynthesis involves the three-step methylation of phosphatidylethanolamine, catalyzed by phospholipid N-methyltransferases (Pmts). While the binding site for the methyl donor S-adenosyl-l-methionine is well characterized in Pmt enzymes, the detailed mechanism of methyl group transfer remains poorly understood. In this study, we combined computational and biochemical approaches to identify the amino acid residues critical for the catalytic activity of two distinct Pmt classes: the Rhodobacter (R)-type enzyme from Rubellimicrobium thermophilum (RtPmtA) and the Sinorhizobium (S)-type enzyme from Agrobacterium tumefaciens (AtPmtA). Despite low sequence identity, both enzyme types share similar reaction mechanisms, with tyrosine residues playing key roles in methyl group transfer. In RtPmtA, two highly conserved tyrosines located within the substrate-binding pocket on the N-terminal αA-helix are critical for enzymatic function. In contrast, AtPmtA depends on a single tyrosine buried in the protein core for catalysis. These findings reveal distinct active site architectures and suggest that R-type and S-type enzymes have evolved class-specific structural strategies for tyrosine activation. This divergence highlights the evolutionary flexibility of Pmt enzymes, despite their shared catalytic function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.