ArticleJournal of diabetes investigation2026
Type 1 diabetes-specific distress among adults with type 1 diabetes in Japan.
Article in Journal of diabetes investigation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Beyond global diabetes distress: What does PAID capture in type 1 diabetes?Journal of diabetes investigation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe prevalence and characteristics of diabetes distress (DD) in Japanese adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D) remain unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the prevalence and associated features of DD in this population. A cross-sectional study was conducted using the Type 1 Diabetes Distress Scale (T1-DDS), the Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) scale, and the Hypoglycemia Fear Survey (HFS). Data from 117 adults with T1D were analyzed. Group comparisons were made using t-tests and anova, and associations were assessed using Spearman's rank correlation. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to examine the structure of the T1-DDS.
resultsOf the 144 screened participants, 117 (mean age: 50.6 ± 12.8 years; 44.4% male; mean diabetes duration: 18.1 ± 10.7 years; mean HbA1c: 7.6% ± 0.9%) were included in the analysis. Moderate and high DD were observed in 30.8% and 16.2%, respectively. Participants with high DD had significantly higher PAID and HFS-Worry/Behavior scores, despite no significant differences in age, sex, diabetes duration, or HbA1c. Among T1-DDS subscales, Powerlessness and Eating Distress had the highest mean scores. All subscale scores were correlated with total distress (rho = 0.636-0.916) and showed good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.784-0.875). CFA supported the seven-factor structure with marginal-to-acceptable model fit.
conclusionDD is prevalent in Japanese adults with T1D. The T1-DDS can be a useful screening tool for identifying individuals experiencing diabetes-related emotional burden and guiding personalized interventions for these individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.