ReviewAdvanced healthcare materials2026
A Data Driven Review of In Vitro Electrical and Mechanical Stimulation for Post-Acute Phase Wound Healing.
Review in Advanced healthcare materials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This review explores the role of in vitro electrical and mechanical stimulation in modulating wound-healing behavior, with a primary focus on the predominant skin cell types: fibroblasts and keratinocytes. By analyzing the existing literature, we delineate the complex relationships between stimulation parameters-such as voltage, current, frequency, and mechanical strain-and cellular responses, including proliferation and migration. Our data-driven approach compiled more than 390 experimental data points for electrical stimulation and over 170 for mechanical stimulation in vitro, constructing a comprehensive library of cell responses that were previously fragmented and difficult to compare across studies. We critically evaluate various stimulation platforms and configurations, emphasizing their influence on cellular mechanobiology and their translational potential in regenerative medicine. Ultimately, this review underscores the necessity of a multi-parameter optimization strategy to effectively exploit electromechanical cues for targeted skin tissue regeneration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.