Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42068185›Full record

ArticleAdvanced healthcare materials2026

Copolymers of Poly(Butylene Trans-1,4-Cyclohexanedicarboxylate)/Pripol as New Biomaterial Platform for Small Diameter Vascular Graft.

Edoardo Bondi, Gabriele Obino, Giulia Guidotti, Alberto Sensini, Martijn van Griensven, Antonio Junior Lepedda, Nadia Lotti, Lorenzo Moroni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced healthcare materials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Edoardo BondiDepartment of Civil, Chemical, Environmental, and Materials Engineering, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9410-8893
Gabriele ObinoDepartment of Complex Tissue Regeneration, MERLN Institute for Technology-Inspired Regenerative Medicine, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3192-755X
Giulia GuidottiDepartment of Civil, Chemical, Environmental, and Materials Engineering, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6879-2989
Alberto SensiniDepartment of Complex Tissue Regeneration, MERLN Institute for Technology-Inspired Regenerative Medicine, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0681-5887
Martijn van GriensvenDepartment of Cell Biology-Inspired Tissue Engineering, MERLN Institute for Technology-Inspired Regenerative Medicine, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5104-9881
Antonio Junior LepeddaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8356-894X
Nadia LottiDepartment of Civil, Chemical, Environmental, and Materials Engineering, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7976-2934
Lorenzo MoroniDepartment of Complex Tissue Regeneration, MERLN Institute for Technology-Inspired Regenerative Medicine, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1298-6025

Funding

Dutch Heart Foundation 03-006-2022-0052European Union 2022-2023European Union CUP J55F21004240001European Union DM 737/2021European Union RISORSE 2021-2022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Autologous grafts remain the clinical gold standard for vascular reconstruction; however, their use is limited by donor site morbidity, poor availability, and long-term failure. Synthetic alternatives, while effective in large-caliber vessels, fail in small-diameter applications (<6 mm) due to thrombosis, intimal hyperplasia, and biomechanical mismatch. In this context, tissue-engineered vascular grafts (TEVGs) emerge as a solution, requiring biomaterials that closely replicate the structural, mechanical, and hemocompatible properties of native vessels. Aliphatic polyesters such as polylactic acid, polyglycolic acid, and poly(ε-caprolactone) are extensively studied but show poor endothelialization and mechanical deficiency. In contrast, poly(butylene trans-1,4-cyclohexanedicarboxylate) (PBCE) attracts interest for its biocompatibility, thermal stability, and processability. Its copolymerization with Pripol 1009, a commercial fatty diacid, enables modulation of mechanical properties and degradation rate, two of the key parameters for vascular engineering. In this work, electrospun scaffolds based on these copolymers are fabricated in flat and tubular formats and characterized in terms of morphology, mechanical behavior, hemocompatibility, and endothelialization potential. Certain formulations display mechanical properties comparable to native vessels, support endothelialization and smooth muscle cell adhesion, and do not trigger coagulation pathways in in vitro assays. These results identify PBCE/Pripol copolymers as promising candidates for next-generation TEVGs, bridging the gap between synthetic reliability and biological performance in small-diameter vascular applications.

Indexed as

Biocompatible MaterialsBlood Vessel ProsthesisPolymersAnimalsHumansPolyestersTissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsBiocompatible MaterialsPolyestersPolymersaliphatic polyesterselectrospinningpoly(butylene trans‐1,4‐cyclohexanedicarboxylate)small diameter vascular graftstubular scaffolds

Identifiers

PMID42068185
PMCPMC13280198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.