ArticleThe Australian journal of rural health2026
Rural Indigenous Experiences of Healthcare Services: A Scoping Review.
Article in The Australian journal of rural health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIndigenous peoples experience significant health inequities compared to non-Indigenous peoples. The reasons for this are multi-faceted. Access to healthcare for marginalised Indigenous peoples is made more difficult by living rurally; urban counterparts have improved healthcare access and health outcomes.
objectiveThis review aimed to further understand the healthcare experiences of rural Indigenous peoples residing in New Zealand (Aotearoa), Australia, Canada or the United States of America (USA). INCLUSION CRITERIA: Participants were required to self-identify as Indigenous consumers of healthcare aged 18 years or older, with personal or family experiences of receiving healthcare. Contextually, rural healthcare service access in any healthcare setting was chosen. The countries chosen for inclusion were New Zealand, Australia, Canada, and the USA. Exclusion criteria included studies with non-Indigenous participants with healthcare experiences that were unable to be isolated and extracted, as well as studies involving both rural and urban healthcare experiences where the urban experiences were unable to be isolated and removed.
methodsThe electronic databases Scopus (Elsevier), CINAHL Complete (EBSCOhost) and Medline (OVID) were searched. Articles were screened by one author (TC) to identify primary research studies that reported patient lived experiences and included Indigenous participants who live rurally. Searches were completed in June 2024 and limited to full text, English language and date limited to 2004-2024. Articles were then analysed via thematic analysis.
findingsSeven articles were analysed. The articles were located in Aotearoa, Australia, and Canada. No suitable studies from the USA were identified or included. Five themes were identified as having impacted the healthcare experiences of Indigenous peoples: distance to care; quality of care and racism; support from and impact on, whānau (family); health professional communication and knowledge sharing; and Indigenous solutions and holistic care.
conclusionEnsuring that patient-centred care also involves wider family members has been shown to be beneficial, as has the engagement of Indigenous health professionals and health workers in providing culturally inclusive healthcare. Health professionals should consider language and communication techniques when engaging with people seeking healthcare and not make assumptions, for example around health knowledge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.