Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42068076›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of clinical psychology2026

Effective factors in the psychotherapy of religious obsessive-compulsive disorder: A qualitative study.

Taha Burak Toprak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of clinical psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Taha Burak ToprakDepartment of Psychology, Ibn Haldun University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7958-4181

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReligious obsessive-compulsive disorder (religious OCD; scrupulosity) presents unique challenges in psychotherapy due to the interaction between religious beliefs and obsessive-compulsive symptoms. Understanding how individuals benefit from psychotherapy in this context can inform more effective and culturally sensitive treatment approaches.

aimsThis study aimed to explore the factors that make psychotherapy effective for individuals experiencing religious obsessions and compulsions.

methodA qualitative design based on a phenomenological approach was employed. In-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with nine participants diagnosed with religious OCD. The collected data were analysed using thematic analysis to identify the core themes that contribute to therapeutic benefit.

resultsThe findings revealed several dimensions that enhanced the therapeutic process. The therapist's competence in religious knowledge and ability to apply this knowledge meaningfully contributed to treatment effectiveness. Participants emphasized that the therapist's religiosity fostered trust and a sense of being understood. Additionally, evidence-based psychotherapeutic methods, such as normalization and psychoeducation, added value to the process. A key finding was that an integrative approach combining religious and scientific psychotherapy knowledge substantially improved outcomes. The therapist's non-judgemental, empathetic and sincere attitude further facilitated clients' sense of safety and engagement in therapy.

conclusionsEffective psychotherapy for religious OCD requires a holistic approach that integrates religious sensitivity with evidence-based therapeutic skills. Such integration plays a crucial role in enhancing client trust, understanding and overall recovery.

Indexed as

Obsessive-Compulsive DisorderProfessional-Patient RelationsPsychotherapyReligion and PsychologyAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchYoung Adultqualitative researchreligious obsessive‐compulsive disorder (scrupulosity)thematic analysistherapeutic factors

Identifiers

PMID42068076
PMCPMC13655989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.