Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42068019›Full record

ArticleJournal of anatomy2026

The variability of giraffe skull morphology.

Nikolaos Kargopoulos, Jesús Marugán-Lobón, Anusuya Chinsamy-Turan, Bernard R Agwanda, Michael Butler Brown, Stephanie Fennessy, Sara Ferguson, Rigardt Hoffman, Fredrick Lala, Arthur Muneza and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of anatomy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Nikolaos KargopoulosDepartment of Biological Science, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6471-151X
Jesús Marugán-LobónUnidad de Paleontología, Department of Biology, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3766-8560
Anusuya Chinsamy-TuranDepartment of Biological Science, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Bernard R AgwandaNational Museums of Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya.
Michael Butler BrownGiraffe Conservation Foundation, Windhoek, Namibia.
Stephanie FennessyGiraffe Conservation Foundation, Windhoek, Namibia.
Sara FergusonGiraffe Conservation Foundation, Windhoek, Namibia.
Rigardt HoffmanGiraffe Conservation Foundation, Windhoek, Namibia.
Fredrick LalaWildlife Research and Training Institute, Naivasha, Kenya.
Arthur MunezaGiraffe Conservation Foundation, Windhoek, Namibia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2128-1820
Ogeto MwebiNational Museums of Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya.
Moses OtiendeWildlife Research and Training Institute, Naivasha, Kenya.
Alice PetzoldInstitute of Biochemistry and Biology, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.
Sven WinterSenckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Abdoul Razack Moussa ZabeirouFaculty of Tropical AgriSciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Julian FennessyGiraffe Conservation Foundation, Windhoek, Namibia.

Funding

Giraffe Conservation Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Giraffe (Giraffa spp.) are among the most unique and charismatic extant animals, largely due to their distinct morphology. The evolutionary and developmental origin of ossicones is a key factor in giraffid biology, yet other features building their characteristic head physiognomy remain poorly studied. Here, we analysed the cranial diversity of extant Giraffa using a continent-wide sample with a balanced sex ratio and ontogenetic growth series, using shape analysis (3D geometric morphometrics). Detailed comparisons showed significant differences in cranial morphology across the four Giraffa species, and in some cases also between subspecies of the same species. The analyses revealed that females reach adult cranial form at an earlier age (around 4 years old), while males continue growing until the eighth year, aligning with the onset of sexual maturity for each of the sexes. Multivariate methods unambiguously prompt significant covariation between skull parts. Such high covariation patterns indicate that Giraffa skull morphology largely evolves as a whole (i.e., morphologically integrated), even though parts of it (such as the ossicones) develop in different magnitudes. Considering their role in territorial and mating behaviours, we suggest that ossicone morphology influences the parapatric evolution of Giraffa through sexual selection. Palaeontological evidence shows that development of larger ossicones is a relatively recent trait for members of the genus Giraffa, with the cranial morphology of the southern giraffe (Giraffa giraffa) being the closest to that of the ancestral forms, possibly through plesiomorphy or paedomorphosis.

Indexed as

GiraffesSkullAnimalsBiological EvolutionFemaleMaleallometryevolutionGiraffaintegrationontogenytaxonomy

Identifiers

PMID42068019
PMCPMC13645351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.