Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42067986›Full record

ArticleVeterinary dermatology2026

Artificial Intelligence-Based Identification of Common Canine Skin Lesions From Clinical Images.

Soh-Yoon Kang, Yeong-Hun Kang, Hyun-Jung Kim, Eun-A Huh, Jong-Soo Jeon, Hyun-Su Kim, Min-Sun Kim, Anisha Tiwari, Cheol-Yong Hwang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary dermatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Soh-Yoon KangLaboratory of Veterinary Dermatology and the Research Institute for Veterinary Science, College of Veterinary Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3551-5576
Yeong-Hun KangLaboratory of Veterinary Dermatology and the Research Institute for Veterinary Science, College of Veterinary Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9524-024X
Hyun-Jung KimAIFORPET Corporation, Seoul, Korea.
Eun-A HuhAIFORPET Corporation, Seoul, Korea.
Jong-Soo JeonAIFORPET Corporation, Seoul, Korea.
Hyun-Su KimAIFORPET Corporation, Seoul, Korea.
Min-Sun KimLaboratory of Veterinary Dermatology and the Research Institute for Veterinary Science, College of Veterinary Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9045-4388
Anisha TiwariSuvidha Pet Care and Derma Centre, Jammu, Jammu and Kashmir, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-4383-3823
Cheol-Yong HwangLaboratory of Veterinary Dermatology and the Research Institute for Veterinary Science, College of Veterinary Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7113-0361

Funding

AIFORPET Corp
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccurate evaluation of skin lesions is an essential component of dermatological examination, yet it can be time-consuming and subject to interobserver variability. While artificial intelligence (AI) models have shown reliability in diagnosing specific skin diseases, lesion-level identification remains underexplored in veterinary dermatology.

objectivesTo develop and evaluate a convolutional neural network (CNN)-based AI model for the automated identification of four skin lesion types in dogs: erythema, lichenification, alopecia and erosion/ulcer. ANIMALS: Clinical skin images were collected from dogs presented to a veterinary medical teaching hospital. MATERIALS AND

methodsFour EfficientNet models were independently trained, one for each lesion type. Model performance was evaluated by comparing the prediction results with veterinary surgeon-labelled data, using six metrics: accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and F1 score.

resultsAll four CNN models achieved an accuracy of > 90%, indicating a reliable performance across all lesion types. The alopecia model yielded the highest accuracy (98.12%) and F1 score (98.18%). The erythema and erosion/ulcer models exhibited balanced performance across all metrics. For the lichenification model, the sensitivity (87.02%) and F1 score (89.88%) were the lowest among the four lesion types. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The CNN-based AI models developed in this study demonstrated validity in identifying common canine skin lesions from clinical images. These models may facilitate rapid and objective dermatological evaluation, supporting clinical diagnosis and lesion monitoring throughout treatment.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDog DiseasesSkin DiseasesAlopeciaAnimalsConvolutional Neural NetworksDogsReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificitySkinconvolutional neural networksdeep learningdogEfficientNetteledermatology

Identifiers

PMID42067986
PMCPMC13356492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.