ArticleBMC oral health2026
Radiograph-based epidemiology of impacted teeth in Sana'a City, Yemen: a multicenter retrospective study.
Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundImpacted teeth are a common dental anomaly and may be associated with several radiographic findings, including dental caries, root resorption, and cystic changes. Radiograph-based epidemiological data from Yemen remain limited.
objectiveTo assess the radiograph-based prevalence and radiographic characteristics of impacted teeth among patients attending panoramic imaging centers in Sana'a City, Yemen.
methodsA retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted using 16,575 digital panoramic radiographs collected from 12 panoramic imaging centers in Sana'a City between 2020 and 2022. Radiographs were evaluated for the presence of impacted teeth and analyzed according to age, gender, tooth type, location, angulation, level and depth of impaction, and associated radiographic findings.
resultsImpacted teeth were identified in 2,378 radiographs, yielding a radiograph-level prevalence of 14.3%. The highest frequency was observed among patients aged 20-29 years, with a significantly higher prevalence in females. Third molars accounted for 85.9% of all impacted teeth. Vertical and mesio-angular angulations were the most common patterns, while Level B and partial bony impactions predominated. Radiographic findings suggestive of dental caries and root resorption were frequently observed.
conclusionImpacted teeth, particularly third molars, were commonly detected among patients undergoing panoramic imaging in Sana'a City. Panoramic radiography is a useful screening tool for identifying impaction patterns and related radiographic features; however, the findings represent radiograph-based estimates from imaging centers and should not be interpreted as population prevalence. Clinical correlation remains essential for definitive diagnosis and management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.