Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42067810›Full record

ArticleBMC neurology2026

Real-world effectiveness of onabotulinumtoxinA as first-line treatment in chronic migraine and sequential transition to anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies: a retrospective multicenter study.

Katarzyna Kępczyńska, Izabela Domitrz, Adam Stępień, Agnieszka Michalak-Siembida, Agata Walczak-Ciszewska

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Katarzyna KępczyńskaDepartment of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Medical University of Warsaw, Cegłowska 80, Warsaw, 01-809, Poland. katarzyna.kepczynska@wum.edu.pl.
Izabela DomitrzDepartment of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Medical University of Warsaw, Cegłowska 80, Warsaw, 01-809, Poland.
Adam StępieńDepartment of Neurology, Military Institute of Medicine, National Institute of Science, Szaserów, Warsaw, 04-141, Poland.
Agnieszka Michalak-SiembidaDepartment of Neurology, Military Institute of Medicine, National Institute of Science, Szaserów, Warsaw, 04-141, Poland.
Agata Walczak-CiszewskaFaculty of Chemistry, Gdansk University of Technology, Narutowicza 11/12, Gdańsk, 80-233, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMonoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting the Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide (CGRP) pathway are safe and effective treatments for migraine prevention. However, the high cost of these novel therapies has led to reimbursement policies requiring patients to try multiple traditional preventives before access. Here, we evaluate the real-world effectiveness of onabotulinumtoxinA (BoNT-A) as first-line treatment and describe the sequential transition to anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies in patients who did not achieve sufficient response, within the Polish chronic migraine treatment program.

methodsIn this retrospective cohort study, we included 94 patients with chronic migraine who received BoNT-A treatment according to the PREEMPT protocol every 3-4 months for 12 months as first-line treatment. Headache diaries and documentation were used to evaluate reductions in monthly headache days (MHD) and MIDAS scores. Patients were divided into two subgroups based on their response after three BoNT-A administrations: insufficient response (≤ 50% reduction in MHD) and sufficient response (> 50% reduction in MHD).

resultsWe included 94 patients (93.62% female, age range 22-66 years). Following three BoNT-A injection cycles, 70 patients (74.47%) did not achieve the ≥ 50% response threshold and were sequentially transitioned to fremanezumab per programme protocol. In the insufficient response group, MHD decreased from 18.26 ± 4.46 to 13.90 ± 4.64 days (t(69) = 15.49, p < 0.001), representing a 23.9% reduction, while MIDAS scores decreased from 93.77 ± 41.80 to 61.69 ± 35.56 (t(69) = 10.22, p < 0.001, 34.2% reduction). In the sufficient response group (n = 24, 25.53%), MHD decreased from 17.83 ± 1.95 to 7.83 ± 1.83 days after 3 injections (56.1% reduction, t(23) = 31.97, p < 0.001), and further to 4.13 ± 1.77 days after 5 injections (76.7% reduction, t(22) = 32.59, p < 0.001). Pearson's correlation analysis revealed moderate positive correlation between MHD and MIDAS after 3 injections (r = 0.392, p < 0.001), which weakened substantially after 5 injections (r = 0.082, p = 0.691). Baseline MIDAS scores were numerically higher in the sufficient response group (116.62 ± 61.12 vs. 93.77 ± 41.80, t(92) = 2.04, p = 0.044); however, given the outcome-dependent nature of group allocation, this difference should not be interpreted causally or as a prognostic marker. For patients who did not experience sufficient improvement after the third BoNT-A administration, treatment was changed to fremanezumab.

conclusionsOur real-world data demonstrate that 74.47% of patients with chronic migraine did not achieve the ≥ 50% MHD reduction threshold after three onabotulinumtoxinA injections, supporting the current Polish therapeutic algorithm that allows sequential transition to anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies for insufficient responders.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalBotulinum Toxins, Type ACalcitonin Gene-Related PeptideMigraine DisordersAdultChronic DiseaseFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, MonoclonalBotulinum Toxins, Type ACalcitonin Gene-Related Peptideonabotulinum toxin ACalcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodiesMigraineOnabotulinumtoxinA

Identifiers

PMID42067810
PMCPMC13277076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.