ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2026
Prenatal SNP-array chromosomal microarray analysis in 3,549 pregnancies: indication-specific yields and clinical implications.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSNP-based chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) is widely used in invasive prenatal diagnosis, yet real-world performance across contemporary referral pathways, especially in the NIPT era, remains incompletely characterized.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 3,549 prenatal invasive samples tested by SNP array, and evaluated diagnostic yield overall and by referral indication and ultrasound phenotype.
resultsIn total, we identified 398 pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants across 386 fetuses, resulting in an overall diagnostic yield of 10.9% (386/3,549). These findings comprised 223 aneuploidies and 175 pathogenic CNVs. In contrast, variants of uncertain significance (VOUS) were detected in 12.0% (426/3,549) of cases. Diagnostic yields were heavily stratified by indication: yields peaked in NIPT high-risk referrals (38.9%) and were intermediate in ultrasound-based cases (~ 11%), but dropped significantly in the advanced maternal age (AMA; 4.2%) and serum screening (~ 5-6%) groups. Conversely, VOUS rates remained remarkably stable across all referral categories. Sub-analysis of ultrasound abnormalities revealed that multisystem anomalies conferred the highest risk (27.3%), driven predominantly by aneuploidies; among soft markers, increased nuchal translucency (NT) emerged as the strongest predictor of chromosomal pathology.
conclusionsIn our cohort, SNP-array identified clinically actionable findings in 10.9% of cases. NIPT enriched diagnostic yields, particularly for aneuploidies, and NT thickness was strongly associated with pathogenic findings. These results support an indication-based approach to genomic testing, with NIPT as a triage tool for aneuploidy and CMA for high-risk populations, while improving VOUS counseling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.