ArticleBMC surgery2026
Optimization of surgical strategies and clinical efficacy analysis for infected classic preauricular fistula.
Article in BMC surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study evaluated the effects of surgical timing, microscope-assisted operation, and partial helix crus cartilage resection on operation duration, postoperative incision healing, recurrence rate, and scar formation in children with infected classic preauricular fistula, analyzed the clinical value of different surgical strategies for its standardized treatment, and ensured result reliability via rigorous control of selection and temporal confounding.
methodsA retrospective analysis was performed on 74 children who underwent surgery for infected classic preauricular fistula, grouped by intraoperative infection status (early erythema-swelling, prolonged erythema-swelling, localized abscess), microscope application, and cartilage resection. Selection bias was controlled by baseline comparison; confounders (age, sex, infection severity) were adjusted via 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) and multivariable regression. Group differences in key efficacy indicators were compared, with nonparametric tests for non-normally distributed data (median [IQR]). Post-hoc power analysis and learning curve analysis (study period: 2021-2023 [early], 2024-2025 [late]) were also conducted.
resultsBaseline characteristics were comparable across all groups (P > 0.05). For surgical timing subgroups, recurrence rate and incision healing showed no intergroup differences (P > 0.05), but the localized abscess group had significantly longer operation duration (61.8 ± 8.8 min, median 62.0 [56.0-68.0] min) and lower scar scores (2.5 ± 0.6 points, median 2.0 [2.0-3.0] points) than the early (37.7 ± 4.9 min, median 38.0 [35.0-41.0] min) and prolonged erythema-swelling groups (42.7 ± 7.4 min, median 43.0 [38.0-47.0] min) (P < 0.05), with no significant difference in median [IQR] follow-up time (P > 0.05). Microscope application had no significant effects on all efficacy indicators (P > 0.05), with consistent results after PSM; follow-up time and recurrence rate also showed no intergroup differences (P > 0.05). The cartilage resection group had a significantly lower postoperative recurrence rate (1.75%, 1/57) than the non-resection group (17.65%, 3/17), with this difference remaining significant after multivariable regression (P < 0.05). Learning curve analysis revealed significantly shorter operation duration in the late study stage (59.2 ± 10.8 min) than the early stage (68.5 ± 12.3 min, P < 0.001), with no difference in recurrence rate (4.8% vs. 1.7%, P = 0.321). Post-hoc power analysis showed 72% power for detecting recurrence rate differences and 89% for operation duration differences. Subgroup analyses found no significant recurrence rate differences between non-abscess and abscess groups (2.0% vs. 4.5%, P = 0.432) or between different preoperative management groups (2.6% vs. 4.5%, P = 0.587).
conclusionFor children with infected classic preauricular fistula, early infection stage before localized abscess formation is the recommended surgical timing, which shortens operation duration and improves scar satisfaction. Intraoperative partial helix crus cartilage resection effectively reduces postoperative recurrence risk, with strict control of resection range to preserve auricle morphology. Microscope-assisted operation has no obvious advantages in reducing recurrence or improving incision healing, and its clinical application can be individualized. This study is limited by small sample size, only 4 recurrence events in 74 patients leading to underpowered detection for the primary outcome (recurrence rate), and premature 3-month scar assessment prior to full scar maturation (6-12 months). The conclusions require verification via large-sample multicenter randomized controlled trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.