ArticleBMC plant biology2026
Regulation of rhizosphere bacterial communities and physiological phenotypes in maize by biochar under deficit irrigation.
Article in BMC plant biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBiochar application in cropland can alleviate water deficiency and promote maize growth, but its underlying physiological mechanisms remain unclear. This study conducted pot experiments with 2 × 3 factorial combinations of biochar dosages (0 (Non-B), 1% (B-applied)) and irrigation regimes (well-watered (WW), moderate-deficit (MD), and severe-deficit (SD)), forming 6 treatments (BWW, WW, BMD, MD, BSD, and SD) to explore key driving factors and physiological mechanisms of biochar promoting maize growth.
resultsBiochar increased soil organic matter, available P and available K contents, enhanced rhizosphere bacterial diversity, and raised the abundance of bacteria such as Streptomyces. These changes reshaped plant internal physiological responses, elevating indole acetic acid and abscisic acid while preserving photosystem II integrity (higher maximum photochemical quantum efficiency and potential photochemical activity of photosystem II). Consequently, compared to MD and SD treatments, biochar (BMD and BSD) sustained higher gas exchange, increasing by 9% and 7%, and g by 23% and 50%, respectively. This ultimately promoted whole-plant biomass accumulation, increasing above-ground biomass by 26% and 31%, while decreasing the root-shoot ratio by 16% and 20%, respectively.
conclusionsBiochar mitigates the adverse effects of deficit irrigation on maize growth by regulating bacterial community structure, promoting endogenous hormone synthesis, and improving photosynthetic characteristics, with stronger effect under severe-deficit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.