Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42067737›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care2026

Health inequalities and subjective wellbeing.

Francesco Colcerasa, Fabio Pisani

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Francesco ColcerasaUniversity of Rome 'La Sapienza', Rome, Italy.
Fabio PisaniDepartment of Economics, Statistics and Business, Universitas Mercatorum, Rome, Italy. fabio.pisani@unimercatorum.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4492-8890

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We contribute to the literature on subjective well-being by examining the relationship between life satisfaction and health inequalities, focusing on both inequality in outcomes and inequality of opportunity. The role of the latter is tested using the Human Opportunity Index. As sensitivity checks, several indexes are computed using either different health outcomes or different combinations of circumstances. Our findings indicate a negative relationship between life satisfaction and health inequalities. We also show that inequality of opportunity in health outperforms inequality in health outcomes in explaining subjective well-being. These results highlight the importance of considering non-income forms of inequality in understanding subjective well-being. They also point out the role of fairness in this relationship. Additionally, we explore the rationale behind the life satisfaction/inequality of opportunity in health nexus. By splitting the sample, we identify a prominent role for pro-social preferences, particularly the well-being of one's own offspring.

Indexed as

Health InequalityInequality of OpportunitySubjective Well-being

Identifiers

PMID42067737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.