ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
Feasibility of No-Code Deep Learning for Diagnosing Bone Metastasis in Bone Scans: A Comparative Study of Teachable Machine and ResNet.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study explored the feasibility of developing a model that can diagnose positive and negative bone metastasis from bone scan images using Teachable Machine by Google, a no-code AI platform that does not require programming skills or a GPU environment. A fourth-year medical student trained deep learning models using a Teachable Machine on a dataset of 4626 bone scan images from patients with cancer (mean age 65.1 ± 11.3 years; 50.5% female). Because of severe class imbalance (bone metastasis positive:negative = 400:4226), we compared the diagnostic performance of two strategies (original set and augmented dataset with tenfold data augmentation applied to positive images). We investigated the diagnostic performance using various hyperparameters (epochs 50-1000, batch sizes 16-32) with a learning rate of 0.001. The final model generated by Teachable Machine was compared with a conventional deep learning model based on ResNet50. The combination of epoch = 150 and batch size = 16 showed the optimal diagnostic performance. The overall sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were 57.1%, 93.9%, 90.4%, and 68.7%, respectively. Both Teachable Machine and ResNet50 showed good diagnostic performance (area under the curve = 0.812 and 0.869, respectively), although the diagnostic performance of Teachable Machine was inferior to that of the conventional ResNet50 model (p < 0.001). Given its convenience, Teachable Machine represents a valuable and accessible tool for medical education and preliminary model development. It allows researchers without programming skills or GPU resources to construct feasibility models for medical image classification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42067726What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.