ReviewEmergency radiology2026
Altered renal corticomedullary differentiation on CT, Part I: A pictorial review of non-neoplastic causes.
Review in Emergency radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The renal corticomedullary interface represents a physiologic differentiation in perfusion between the highly vascular cortex and the medulla. On computed tomography (CT), the corticomedullary phase (CMP), typically acquired 25-35 s after contrast administration, provides an optimal window for evaluating these perfusion differences during the early phase of contrast enhancement. Although often discussed in the context of neoplastic disease, the loss of corticomedullary differentiation (CMD) most commonly occurs across a variety of nonmalignant processes and can serve as an early indicator of underlying renal pathology, including vascular insults, infectious etiologies, functional disturbances related to acute kidney injury, and fibrotic or infiltrative processes seen in chronic kidney disease. A structured approach to evaluating CMD, recognizing characteristic enhancement patterns of pathology, and correlating them with clinical context can enable radiologists to differentiate among the most common presentations. In this pictorial review, we illustrate the normal appearance and enhancement dynamics of the CMP and highlight characteristic imaging patterns of CMD loss across key nonmalignant entities. These imaging patterns underscore the sensitivity of altered CMD in detecting renal pathologies and may improve diagnostic confidence and guide timely clinical management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42067704What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.