Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42067703›Full record

ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2026

An interpretable survival benefit analytics framework for optimizing cancer treatment decision-making.

Shuchao Chen, Haojiang Li, Hui Mao, Tianhe Wu, Chao Luo, Zhiying Liang, Shanshan Liu, Yifei Liu, Haoyang Zhou, Lizhi Liu and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Shuchao Chen *School of Life & Environmental Science, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin, 541004, China.
Haojiang Li *State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, China.
Hui MaoDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Science and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Tianhe WuDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Science and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Chao LuoState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, China.
Zhiying LiangSun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Shanshan LiuSchool of Life & Environmental Science, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin, 541004, China.
Yifei LiuState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, China.
Haoyang ZhouSchool of Life & Environmental Science, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin, 541004, China.
Lizhi LiuState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, China.
Hongbo ChenSchool of Life & Environmental Science, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin, 541004, China. hongbochen@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0389-7875

Funding

Innovative Research Group Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China 82171906Innovative Research Group Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China 82260358
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optimal treatment decision-making is critical to the long-term survival rate of patients in clinical management of cancer. Traditional treatment decision-making models typically reach treatment decisions indirectly by estimating the various risks to the beneficial outcome of patients, which limits the interpretability of treatment effects and the performance of the models. We propose SurvS(survival supervision), a novel interpretable survival benefit analytics framework based on the real-coded genetic algorithm, to integrate individual treatment effects that directly impact long-term survival benefits. SurvS can not only construct binary (beneficial and nonbeneficial), but also construct ternary (beneficial, insensitive, and detrimental) decision-making models, allowing the identification of all three possible outcomes in a single model. The framework generates personalized model scores by integrating weighted clinical features and real-valued cutoff thresholds, optimized to reflect survival outcome differences. The robust performances of SurvS were demonstrated in decision-making tasks of two clinical cancer treatment scenarios: induction chemotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma and adjuvant chemotherapy for rectal cancer. SurvS outperformed traditional methods and maintained robust performance in the independent validation cohort. By enabling survival benefit-supervised optimization and interpretable model construction, reported SurvS offers a powerful tool for personalized cancer treatment planning with the potential to improve treatment efficacy and reduce overtreatment. The code is open source and available at: https://github.com/odindis/SurvS .

Indexed as

Decision MakingNeoplasmsAlgorithmsGenetic AlgorithmsHumansNasopharyngeal CarcinomaNasopharyngeal NeoplasmsRectal NeoplasmsSurvival AnalysisCancerIndividual treatment effectReal-coded genetic algorithmSurvival benefit analysisTreatment decision-making

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.