ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2026
An interpretable survival benefit analytics framework for optimizing cancer treatment decision-making.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Optimal treatment decision-making is critical to the long-term survival rate of patients in clinical management of cancer. Traditional treatment decision-making models typically reach treatment decisions indirectly by estimating the various risks to the beneficial outcome of patients, which limits the interpretability of treatment effects and the performance of the models. We propose SurvS(survival supervision), a novel interpretable survival benefit analytics framework based on the real-coded genetic algorithm, to integrate individual treatment effects that directly impact long-term survival benefits. SurvS can not only construct binary (beneficial and nonbeneficial), but also construct ternary (beneficial, insensitive, and detrimental) decision-making models, allowing the identification of all three possible outcomes in a single model. The framework generates personalized model scores by integrating weighted clinical features and real-valued cutoff thresholds, optimized to reflect survival outcome differences. The robust performances of SurvS were demonstrated in decision-making tasks of two clinical cancer treatment scenarios: induction chemotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma and adjuvant chemotherapy for rectal cancer. SurvS outperformed traditional methods and maintained robust performance in the independent validation cohort. By enabling survival benefit-supervised optimization and interpretable model construction, reported SurvS offers a powerful tool for personalized cancer treatment planning with the potential to improve treatment efficacy and reduce overtreatment. The code is open source and available at: https://github.com/odindis/SurvS .
Indexed as
Identifiers
42067703What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.