Observational studyJournal of medical systems2026
Prognostic Modeling Based on Post-Endovascular Thrombectomy Systolic Blood Pressure Trajectories Using Explainable Artificial Intelligence: A Secondary Analysis of the OPTIMAL-BP Trial.
Observational study in Journal of medical systems, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04205305 (Outcome in Patients Treated with Intraarterial Thrombectomy - OptiMAL Blood Pressure Control), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Outcome in Patients Treated with Intraarterial Thrombectomy - OptiMAL Blood Pressure Control (OPTIMAL-BP)
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
47 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Blood pressure (BP) management following successful reperfusion after endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is critical in achieving favorable clinical outcomes. Individualized BP management using predictive modeling by machine learning may further improve prediction of functional outcomes. This study was a retrospective analysis of data from the Outcome in Patients Treated with Intra-Arterial Thrombectomy-Optimal Blood Pressure Control (OPTIMAL-BP) trial, a randomized controlled trial comparing between intensive and conventional BP management during the 24 h after successful recanalization by EVT from June 18, 2020, to November 28, 2022. The trial was conducted across 19 centers in South Korea. Machine learning models were developed to predict functional independence (90-day modified Rankin Scale 0 to 2). Model performance was compared between clinical variables only and systolic blood pressure (SBP) metrics in addition to clinical variables. In addition, the Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) analysis was performed to provide model explanation and understand the importance of SBP metrics. A total of 288 patients (61.1% men, median age 75 years [interquartile range, 65-81]) were included. Among the six algorithms, the deep neural network model incorporating SBP metrics performed best on validation, achieving an area under the curve of 0.86 (95% confidence interval, 0.76-0.92) which was significantly better than the model using only clinical variables (area under the curve 0.80 [95% confidence interval, 0.69-0.88], P = .037). Among SBP metrics, SHAP analysis identified time rate of SBP and minimum SBP as important features, with time rate showing greater influence in the intensive group and minimum SBP in the conventional group. Integrating SBP metrics with clinical variables significantly improved machine learning performance in predicting functional outcomes after successful EVT. Explainable artificial intelligence (AI) identified time rate and minimum SBP as key predictors of outcome. Trial Registration Information: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04205305; registered December 17, 2019).
Indexed as
Identifiers
42067698What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.