Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42067698›Full record

Observational studyJournal of medical systems2026

Prognostic Modeling Based on Post-Endovascular Thrombectomy Systolic Blood Pressure Trajectories Using Explainable Artificial Intelligence: A Secondary Analysis of the OPTIMAL-BP Trial.

Rim Yu, JoonNyung Heo, Eunjeong Park, Haram Joo, Jae Wook Jung, Kwang Hyun Kim, Jaeseob Yun, Hyungwoo Lee, Jin Kyo Choi, Il Hyung Lee and 37 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of medical systems, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04205305 (Outcome in Patients Treated with Intraarterial Thrombectomy - OptiMAL Blood Pressure Control), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04205305 phase4completednot on this map

Outcome in Patients Treated with Intraarterial Thrombectomy - OptiMAL Blood Pressure Control (OPTIMAL-BP)

TypeinterventionalSponsorYonsei UniversityRan2020 to 2023Enrolled306ConditionsIschemic StrokeArmsconventional blood pressure control (labetalol, nicardipine), intensive blood pressure control (labetalol, nicardipine)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

47 authors.

Rim YuDepartment of Neurology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemoon-gu, Seoul, 03722, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3214-8590
JoonNyung HeoDepartment of Neurology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemoon-gu, Seoul, 03722, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6287-6348
Eunjeong ParkIntegrative Research Center for Cerebrovascular and Cardiovascular Diseases, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2257-3478
Haram JooDepartment of Radiology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3297-1288
Jae Wook JungDepartment of Neurology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemoon-gu, Seoul, 03722, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9219-8522
Kwang Hyun KimDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, South Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-1436-0009
Jaeseob YunDepartment of Neurology, Keimyung University Dongsan Hospital, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8884-4114
Hyungwoo LeeDepartment of Neurology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemoon-gu, Seoul, 03722, Korea.
Jin Kyo ChoiDepartment of Neurology, Seoul Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Il Hyung LeeDepartment of Neurology, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Seoul, Korea.
In Hwan LimDepartment of Neurology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemoon-gu, Seoul, 03722, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9120-8549
Soon-Ho HongDepartment of Neurology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemoon-gu, Seoul, 03722, Korea.
Minyoul BaikDepartment of Neurology, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yongin, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6582-0953
Byung Moon KimDepartment of Radiology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8593-6841
Dong Joon KimDepartment of Radiology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Na-Young ShinDepartment of Radiology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1157-6366
Bang-Hoon ChoDepartment of Neurology, Korea University Anam Hospital and College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Seong Hwan AhnDepartment of Neurology, Chosun University School of Medicine, Gwangju, Korea.
Hyungjong ParkDepartment of Neurology, Brain Research Institute, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6112-2939
Sung-Il SohnDepartment of Neurology, Brain Research Institute, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
Jeong-Ho HongDepartment of Neurology, Brain Research Institute, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
Tae-Jin SongDepartment of Neurology, College of Medicine, Seoul Hospital, Ewha Woman's University, Seoul, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9937-762X
Yoonkyung ChangDepartment of Neurology, Mokdong Hospital, Ewha Woman's University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0345-2278
Gyu Sik KimDepartment of Neurology, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Korea.
Kwon-Duk SeoDepartment of Radiology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3154-8864
Kijeong LeeDepartment of Neurology, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Korea.
Jun Young ChangDepartment of Neurology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Jung Hwa SeoDepartment of Neurology, Dong-A University Hospital, Busan, South Korea.
Sukyoon LeeDepartment of Neurology, Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, South Korea.
Jang-Hyun BaekDepartment of Neurology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6733-0683
Han-Jin ChoDepartment of Neurology, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea.
Dong Hoon ShinDepartment of Neurology, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Korea.
Jinkwon KimDepartment of Neurology, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yongin, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0156-9736
Joonsang YooDepartment of Neurology, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yongin, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1169-6798
Yo Han JungDepartment of Neurology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3048-4718
Yang-Ha HwangDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, South Korea.
Chi Kyung KimDepartment of Neurology, Korea University Guro Hospital and College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Jae Guk KimDepartment of Neurology, Daejeon Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University School of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea.
Chan Joo LeeDepartment of Health Promotion, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8756-409X
Sungha ParkCardiovascular Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5362-478X
Hye Sun LeeDepartment of Research Affairs, Biostatistics Collaboration Unit, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6328-6948
Sun U KwonDepartment of Neurology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2247-3039
Oh Young BangDepartment of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7962-8751
Ji Hoe HeoDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine CHA university, CHA Bundang Medical Center, Seongnam-si, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9898-3321
Young Dae KimDepartment of Neurology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemoon-gu, Seoul, 03722, Korea. neuro05@yuhs.ac.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5750-2616
Hyo Suk NamDepartment of Neurology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemoon-gu, Seoul, 03722, Korea. hsnam@yuhs.ac.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4415-3995
OPTIMAL-BP trial investigators

Funding

Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea HC19C0028
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Blood pressure (BP) management following successful reperfusion after endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is critical in achieving favorable clinical outcomes. Individualized BP management using predictive modeling by machine learning may further improve prediction of functional outcomes. This study was a retrospective analysis of data from the Outcome in Patients Treated with Intra-Arterial Thrombectomy-Optimal Blood Pressure Control (OPTIMAL-BP) trial, a randomized controlled trial comparing between intensive and conventional BP management during the 24 h after successful recanalization by EVT from June 18, 2020, to November 28, 2022. The trial was conducted across 19 centers in South Korea. Machine learning models were developed to predict functional independence (90-day modified Rankin Scale 0 to 2). Model performance was compared between clinical variables only and systolic blood pressure (SBP) metrics in addition to clinical variables. In addition, the Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) analysis was performed to provide model explanation and understand the importance of SBP metrics. A total of 288 patients (61.1% men, median age 75 years [interquartile range, 65-81]) were included. Among the six algorithms, the deep neural network model incorporating SBP metrics performed best on validation, achieving an area under the curve of 0.86 (95% confidence interval, 0.76-0.92) which was significantly better than the model using only clinical variables (area under the curve 0.80 [95% confidence interval, 0.69-0.88], P = .037). Among SBP metrics, SHAP analysis identified time rate of SBP and minimum SBP as important features, with time rate showing greater influence in the intensive group and minimum SBP in the conventional group. Integrating SBP metrics with clinical variables significantly improved machine learning performance in predicting functional outcomes after successful EVT. Explainable artificial intelligence (AI) identified time rate and minimum SBP as key predictors of outcome. Trial Registration Information: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04205305; registered December 17, 2019).

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceBlood PressureEndovascular ProceduresThrombectomyAgedAged, 80 and overClinical Trials, Phase IV as TopicFemaleHumansMachine LearningMalePredictive Learning ModelsPrognosisRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRepublic of KoreaRetrospective StudiesArtificial intelligenceBlood pressureOutcomeThrombectomy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.