ArticleEndocrine2026
Machine learning-based prediction model for Fear of progression in thyroid cancer survivors.
Article in Endocrine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to develop and compare machine learning prediction models for Fear of Progression (FOP) in thyroid cancer survivors, providing an effective tool for early clinical identification of high-risk populations.
methodsA cross-sectional study design was adopted, enrolling 356 thyroid cancer patients, among whom 33.5% exhibited clinically significant FOP symptoms. Predictive variables were systematically collected, including clinical characteristics, treatment regimens, and psychosocial factors. Five machine learning algorithms (logistic regression, elastic net, support vector machine, random forest, and XGBoost) were employed to construct prediction models. Model performance was evaluated using metrics such as the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, and sensitivity.
resultsUnivariate analysis identified several factors significantly associated with FOP, including advanced tumor stage (III–IV), total thyroidectomy, adjuvant radioactive iodine therapy, lower psychological resilience, and inadequate social support. (P < 0.05). Comparative analysis of machine learning models demonstrated that the XGBoost model achieved the highest predictive performance (AUC = 0.84, accuracy = 85.14%), followed by the random forest model (AUC = 0.83, sensitivity = 77%), while the remaining models exhibited relatively lower predictive efficacy.
conclusionThe XGBoost-based prediction model demonstrated superior performance in assessing FOP risk among thyroid cancer patients, serving as an effective clinical screening tool for high-risk populations and providing a scientific basis for early psychological intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42067689What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.