SynthesisNeurosurgical review2026
The efficacy of ventriculosubgaleal shunt in managing neonatal hydrocephalus due to intraventricular hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) is a severe complication in premature neonates, occurring in 25%-30% of cases and often leading to posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus (PHH). When blood clots in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), preventing permanent shunt placement, temporary interventions are considered. Ventriculosubgaleal shunt (VSGS) utilizes the subgaleal space to absorb and drain excess CSF, reducing infection risk and allowing hydrocephalus control until the neonate reaches an appropriate weight and CSF clarity. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluate the safety and efficacy of VSGS in treating neonatal PHH. A systematic review was conducted using Medline, Embase, and Web of Science following Cochrane and PRISMA guidelines. Eligible studies included those with ≥ 4 neonates. The primary outcomes analyzed were VSGS-related infection, VSGS revision, VSGS catheter migration, catheter obstruction, VSGS-related CSF leakage, permanent ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) placement, overall mortality, and procedure-related mortality. A total of nineteen studies, encompassing 562 neonates, were included in our analysis. The pooled VSGS-related infection rate was 9% (95%CI: 5% to 12%). The need for VSGS revision was observed in 4% of cases (95%CI: 0% to 8%). The catheter obstruction rate was 2% (95% CI: 0% to 5%), while VSGS catheter migration occurred in 1% of cases (95%CI: 0% to 5%). VSGS-related CSF leakage was reported in 6% of neonates (95%CI: 3% to 9%). Permanent VPS placement was required in 75% of patients (95%CI: 67% to 82%). The overall mortality rate was 10% (95%CI: 4% to 16%), and the procedure-related mortality rate was 1% (95%CI: 0% to 2%). This systematic review and meta-analysis identified VSGS as a safe and effective option for treating hydrocephalus caused by IVH in premature neonates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42067675What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.