ArticleNature biotechnology2026
TxPert: using multiple knowledge graphs for prediction of transcriptomic perturbation effects.
Article in Nature biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Bidirectional network hubs: NT-genes as candidate targets for partial cancer reversal.Frontiers in systems biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurately predicting cellular responses to genetic perturbations is essential for understanding disease mechanisms and designing effective therapies. Yet, exhaustively exploring the space of possible perturbations (for example, multigene perturbations or across tissues and cell types) is prohibitively expensive, motivating methods that can generalize to unseen conditions. We present TxPert, a latent-transfer-based deep learning method that uses multiple knowledge graphs of gene (product)-gene (product) relationships to predict transcriptomic perturbation effects. Different knowledge graphs encode complementary information and we show that a combination of graphs derived from biological databases and high-throughput perturbation screens yields the best performance. For predictions of single unseen perturbations, TxPert approaches the performance of split-half experimental reproducibility. For double unseen perturbations and single perturbations in a different cell line, its predictions increase Person Δ for unseen single perturbations by 8-25% over existing methods.
Identifiers
42067667What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.