ArticleScientific reports2026
Caregivers' knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding secondary prevention of stroke in patients with ischemic stroke.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate caregivers' knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) regarding secondary stroke prevention in individuals with ischemic stroke. A cross-sectional survey was administered once per participant during the recruitment period from March 26, 2024 to March 27, 2025 across five hospitals in Sichuan Province, using a standardized questionnaire to gather data. Participants' demographic information was recorded, and KAP scores related to secondary stroke prevention were assessed. A total of 589 valid questionnaires were analyzed. The majority of participants were female (63.0%), lived in urban areas (70.6%), and had at least an associate degree (34.8%). The scores for knowledge, attitude, and practice were 10.85 ± 4.61 (possible range: 0-22), 34.66 ± 4.82 (possible range: 10-50), and 38.51 ± 6.06 (possible range: 10-50), respectively. Correlation analysis revealed significant positive relationships between knowledge and practice (r = 0.123, P = 0.003) and between attitude and practice (r = 0.338, P < 0.001). However, the correlation between knowledge and attitude was not significant. Structural equation modeling indicated that knowledge directly affected practice (β = 0.140, P = 0.032), and attitude also directly affected practice (β = 0.253, P = 0.016). Overall, caregivers reported lower knowledge scores and less favorable attitudes, while practice scores were comparatively higher within the observed range. Both knowledge and attitude had a direct effect on caregiving behaviors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.