ArticleScientific reports2026
Unified modelling of gaze and pupil dynamics in saccadic tasks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study introduces a unified phenomenological framework to characterize the interconnected dynamics of gaze displacement and pupillary area variation during large-amplitude (30°) horizontal saccades. Using a high-resolution dataset from 242 healthy participants, we modeled primary saccadic shifts and post-saccadic oscillations (PSO) using a combined sigmoidal Boltzmann and damped harmonic oscillator approach. Our framework demonstrates that even after correcting for pupil foreshortening error, the pupillary signal contains physiological PSO-like oscillations that mirror gaze dynamics-a phenomenon previously uncharacterized in the literature. To account for the non-normal, heavy-tailed distribution of oculomotor parameters, population characteristics were defined using t location-scale modeling. Non-parametric Wilcoxon signed-rank tests revealed significant directional asymmetries; specifically, leftward movements exhibited longer total durations (∆t) and slower stabilization compared to rightward shifts. However, mechanical parameters such as oscillation amplitude and gaze baseline offsets remained directionally invariant (p > 0.01), suggesting a decoupling between asymmetric neural motor preparation and symmetrical biomechanical constraints. By establishing high-precision baseline parameters in an extensive population, this model provides a foundation for using joint gaze-pupil signatures as sensitive biomarkers for detecting subtle oculomotor and autonomic dysfunctions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.