Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42067582›Full record

ArticleNature biomedical engineering2026

Towards generalizable AI in medicine via Generalist-Specialist Collaboration.

Sunan He, Yuxiang Nie, Hongmei Wang, Shu Yang, Yihui Wang, Zhiyuan Cai, Zhixuan Chen, Yingxue Xu, Linshan Wu, Ngai Shing Cheng and 17 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors.

Sunan He *Department of Computer Science and Engineering, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, China.
Yuxiang Nie *Department of Computer Science and Engineering, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, China.
Hongmei WangDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, China.
Shu YangDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, China.
Yihui WangDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-7606-9816
Zhiyuan CaiDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, China.
Zhixuan ChenDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8767-7177
Yingxue XuDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9657-3107
Linshan WuDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, China.
Ngai Shing ChengDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, China.
Luyang LuoDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7485-4151
Huiling XiangDepartment of Ultrasound, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5734-4080
Xi LinDepartment of Ultrasound, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2984-1703
Mingxiang WuDepartment of Radiology, Shenzhen People's Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Yifan PengPopulation Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9309-8331
George ShihDepartment of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Ziyang XuPerelman Department of Dermatology, New York Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.
Xian WuJarvis Research Center, Tencent YouTu Lab, Shenzhen, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1118-9710
Qiong WangShenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Ronald Cheong Kin ChanDepartment of Anatomical and Cellular Pathology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Varut VardhanabhutiDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6677-3194
Xiaohui DuanDepartment of Radiology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2224-0887
Winnie Chiu Wing ChuDepartment of Imaging and Interventional Radiology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4962-4132
Yefeng ZhengMedical Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Westlake University, Hangzhou, China.
Pranav RajpurkarDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Kang ZhangFaculty of Medicine, The Macau University of Science and Technology, Macao, China.
Hao ChenDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, China. jhc@cse.ust.hk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8400-3780

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Generalist foundation models (GFMs) are renowned for their exceptional capability and flexibility in diverse tasks. In the field of medicine, while GFMs exhibit superior generalizability, specialist models excel in precision because of their domain-specific knowledge. Here we show a cooperative framework, Generalist-Specialist Collaboration (GSCo), that synergistically combines a powerful generalist model with lightweight specialists. In this framework, specialists provide expert guidance, such as diagnostic predictions and visually similar clinical cases, as contextual information to the generalist, which then makes a final diagnosis. We developed MedDr, an open-source GFM tailored for medicine, as well as a suite of lightweight specialist models crafted for specific downstream tasks. A comprehensive evaluation on 32 datasets across diverse medical modalities shows that MedDr outperforms state-of-the-art GFMs on downstream datasets. Furthermore, GSCo exceeds GFMs and specialists in medical image diagnosis and report generation. This approach offers an effective and computationally efficient paradigm for deploying GFMs in clinical settings, enhancing scalability and enabling precise analysis across a wide range of scenarios.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.