ArticleScientific reports2026
A hybrid flower pollination algorithm-deep learning approach for strength prediction of sustainable recycled fine aggregate concrete with GUI-based implementation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study presents an integrated experimental-machine learning framework for evaluating and predicting the compressive strength of sustainable rigid pavement concrete incorporating 50% washed recycled fine aggregates (WRFA) as a replacement for natural fine aggregates, together with zirconia silica fume (ZSF) and steel slag (SS) as supplementary cementitious materials. The novelty lies in the development of a hybrid Flower Pollination Algorithm-optimized deep neural network (FPA-DNN) that enhances prediction accuracy, robustness to noise, and interpretability through SHAP-based analysis, alongside a GUI-enabled decision-support tool for real-time application. Experimental findings indicated that 50% WRFA reduced compressive strength by 29.6%, 25.2%, and 23.9% at 7, 28, and 90 days, respectively, relative to the control mix. Among the investigated formulations, 20% SS cement replacement (SS20) provided the most favorable performance, limiting flexural strength reduction to approximately 3% and split tensile strength loss to 3.8% at 28 days while maintaining pavement-grade requirements. SEM-based microstructural evaluation of the optimal WRFA50 + SS20 mixture confirmed a denser cementitious matrix, reduced porosity, and improved interfacial transition zone bonding, attributed to SS-induced secondary hydration. A dataset comprising 264 samples (103 laboratory-generated and 161 collected from screened literature) was used to train and compare five regression models: kNN, RF, ANN, DNN, and FPA-DNN. Using 10-fold cross-validation, the FPA-DNN achieved the highest predictive accuracy, yielding testing performance of R² = 0.96 ± 0.006, RMSE = 2.87 ± 0.09 MPa, and MAPE = 4.38 ± 0.13%, outperforming kNN (R² = 0.85), RF (0.86), ANN (0.89), and standalone DNN (0.91). A noise-robustness assessment, conducted by applying additive white Gaussian noise to the target variable (σ up to ~ 1.6% of mean compressive strength), further confirmed the stability of the proposed model, with FPA-DNN retaining R² > 0.90 at the highest noise level (p = 0.20), whereas conventional models exhibited greater degradation. SHapley Additive ExPlanations (SHAP)-based interpretability identified cement content and steel slag as the most influential positive predictors, while WRFA showed a replacement-dependent effect. The proposed framework offers an interpretable and noise-resilient approach for strength prediction of recycled aggregate concrete; however, the present study is limited to a fixed WRFA replacement level and compressive-strength-focused modelling. Future work should extend validation to broader WRFA sources, wider replacement ranges, and durability-based performance indicators for long-term pavement applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.