ArticleThe International journal of eating disorders2026
Safe and Sound: Is Safeness a Specific Affective Dimension Related to Eating Disorder Behaviors?
Article in The International journal of eating disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Safe and Sound: Is Safeness a Specific Affective Dimension Related to Eating Disorder Behaviors?The International journal of eating disorders · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveSafeness is a warm, soothing emotional state that is often experienced in the presence of close others. Safeness is thought to be distinct from other positive emotions or the absence of negative emotions and is shown to predict mental health variables over and above other emotions. The current study investigated the unique role of safeness in relation to eating disorder symptoms.
methodParticipants with eating disorders (n = 164) and those with no history of an eating disorder (n = 49) completed two weeks of ecological momentary assessment to measure affect and eating disorder symptoms.
resultsSafeness emerged as an emotional state distinct from negative and positive affect among women with eating disorders. Safeness predicted the presence (vs. absence) of an eating disorder. Safeness did not predict the occurrence of eating disorder behaviors in real-time when accounting for other emotions. The first binge-eating episode within a day resulted in improvements in safeness in the following hours, but did not result in improvements in other emotions. DISCUSSION: If replicated, our results suggest that safeness might be uniquely implicated in the maintenance of binge-eating episodes. These results highlight the potential importance of integrating interventions targeting safeness into eating disorder treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.