ReviewAnnual review of biomedical engineering2026
Physics-Informed Machine Learning in Biomedical Science and Engineering.
Review in Annual review of biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Practical Tutorial on Physics-Informed Networks for Pharmacometrics and Quantitative Systems Pharmacology.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2026Article
- Mathematical and Computational Models of Biochemical Reactions and Cell Signaling-From Ordinary Differential Equations to Machine Learning.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Noninvasive Assessment of Arterial Compliance and Lumen Pressure in Human Carotid Arteries Using Physics-Informed Neural Networks and Ultrasound Imaging: A Clinical Feasibility Study.Research square · 2026Article
- Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence in Metallic Orthopedic Implant Development: A Narrative Review.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- A Multiscale Signaling-Biophysical Framework Reveals Mechanisms of Macrophage-Mediated RBC Clearance in Sickle Cell and Gaucher Disease.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Physics-Guided Deep Learning for Interpretable Biomedical Image Reconstruction and Pattern Recognition in Diagnostic Frameworks.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Representation meets optimization: Training PINNs and PIKANs for gray-box discovery in systems pharmacology.Computers in biology and medicine · 2026Article
- Identifying systemic vulnerability phenotypes associated with programmed regimens in frozen embryo transfer: a secondary analysis of a multicentre randomized clinical trial.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Organ-on-a-chip platforms for disease modeling and in vitro diagnostic applications.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Physiological sensing for situational awareness: a theory-driven integrative review of multimodal and unsupervised approaches for visual search and human-autonomy teaming.Frontiers in neuroergonomics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Physics-informed machine learning (PIML) is emerging as a potentially transformative paradigm for modeling complex biomedical systems by integrating parameterized physical laws with data-driven methods. Here, we review three main classes of PIML frameworks: physics-informed neural networks (PINNs), neural ordinary differential equations (NODEs), and neural operators (NOs), highlighting their growing role in biomedical science and engineering. We begin with PINNs, which embed governing equations into deep learning models and have been successfully applied to biosolid and biofluid mechanics, mechanobiology, and medical imaging, among other areas. We then review NODEs, which offer continuous-time modeling, especially suited to dynamic physiological systems, pharmacokinetics, and cell signaling. Finally, we discuss deep NOs as powerful tools for learning mappings between function spaces, enabling efficient simulations across multiscale and spatially heterogeneous biological domains. Throughout, we emphasize applications where physical interpretability, data scarcity, or system complexity make conventional black-box learning insufficient. We conclude by identifying open challenges and future directions for advancing PIML in biomedical science and engineering, including issues of uncertainty quantification, generalization, and integration of PIML and large language models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.