ArticleClinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology2026
IFCN position statement: use of artificial intelligence in clinical neurophysiology.
Article in Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Internal and external validation of comprehensive high-frequency activity biomarkers for epilepsy surgery.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026Article
- Beyond Biomarkers: Reclaiming the Central Role of Clinical Neurophysiology in Neuromuscular Disorders.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- From promise to practice: Navigating the challenges of AI integration in clinical neurophysiology.Clinical neurophysiology practice · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) has made significant strides, gaining traction across various domains, including clinical medicine. The integration of AI as a decision-support tool introduces complexities, particularly in ensuring patient safety and upholding clinical accountability. This is especially pertinent in clinical neurophysiology (CNP), where AI shows promise in enhancing the interpretation of neurophysiologic data from modalities such as electroencephalography, electromyography, and others. Recognizing the potential and inherent challenges of AI integration, the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology (IFCN) has set forth guidelines to steer the responsible development, evaluation, and application of AI technologies in CNP. The IFCN's core position on AI in CNP emphasizes improving healthcare outcomes, prioritizing patient-centered care, maintaining transparency in AI-generated interpretations, and supporting, rather than replacing, clinical expertise. As AI technology evolves, the IFCN stresses that models implemented in clinical practice, especially when lacking supervision by experts must meet stringent standards for accuracy, safety, and quality control, and that AI cannot substitute expert care without adequate oversight. The successful integration of AI in CNP hinges on dataset diversity, transparent and ethical training practices, and balancing model complexity with real-world validation. Continuous performance monitoring and clinician feedback are vital to maintaining AI system reliability over time. The IFCN envisions a future where AI ethically enhances CNP practice through multidisciplinary collaboration, focusing on patient safety, clinical integrity, and scientific rigor. Properly implemented, AI can revolutionize CNP by offering real-time decision support, personalized interventions, and remote monitoring, thus advancing the quality of care in CNP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.