ArticleCanadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie
Improving access to surgical care for Inuit communities in Nunavik: a cost-savings analysis of a surgeon outreach program.
Article in Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAccess to timely surgical care in remote regions remains a substantial challenge. We sought to evaluate the societal costs of 2 models for delivering general surgery consultations to Nunavimmiut patients, namely an outreach model involving specialist travel to the Inuulitsivik Health Centre in Puvirnituq, and the traditional model requiring patient transfer to urban tertiary care in Montréal.
methodsWe conducted a cost analysis for all general surgery consultations from May 30, 2022, to May 24, 2024, corresponding to the first 2 years of the specialist travel program. We estimated costs across 4 representative 1-week travel periods. Direct costs included surgeon remuneration, travel, and local service expenses. Indirect costs accounted for lost wages based on the median Nunavik income. Assumptions on travel duration, accommodations, and interpreter services were based on provincial data and Ullivik historical records.
resultsThe specialist travel model was consistently less costly across all periods analyzed. Patients seen in Puvirnituq incurred lower direct and indirect costs than those transferred to Montréal. The annual cost for urban-based care was $1.86 million compared with $163 000, leading to potential cost savings of $1.7 million annually or $12 000 per consultation. Sensitivity analyses confirmed cost advantages under a broad range of assumptions.
conclusionDeploying specialists to Puvirnituq for surgical consultations is a cost-effective alternative to patient displacement. This model holds promise for improving equitable access to care in remote communities while reducing the financial burden on health care systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.