ArticleJournal of affective disorders2026
Functional connectivity during positive mood and anxiety treatment response in children.
Article in Journal of affective disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Self-reported low positive mood is common in youth anxiety disorders and has been associated with poorer treatment response. Functioning of neural affective systems may have distinct associations with treatment relative to self-reported measures and be useful for understanding biological processes related to treatment. This study examined associations between self-reported mood and pre-treatment functional connectivity network patterns during positive mood and treatment response in 73 youth (mean age = 11.1) diagnosed with anxiety disorders. Participants engaged in an fMRI autobiographical memory-based mood induction task in the scanner that successfully improved mood. Participants then completed 16 sessions of cognitive-behavioral or child-centered anxiety treatment. We found no significant differences in how mood changed during the induction task between youth who did and did not recover or respond to treatment. We then used a person-centered method to estimate effective connectivity networks at group, subgroup, and individual levels for each participant. No subgroup-level paths were identified that distinguished treatment responder subgroups. However, treatment responders showed stronger homologous connectivity in the bilateral nucleus accumbens and bilateral amygdala. Responders also showed greater centrality (network influence) of the nucleus accumbens, amygdala, and medial prefrontal cortex on the broader connectivity network. Findings suggest that greater influence of the nucleus accumbens and amygdala on distributed reward and emotion systems is associated with better treatment response, supporting a view that treatment responders capitalize on more responsive reward- and emotion-related brain networks. Future studies should replicate this finding in larger samples and investigate implicated networks as possible treatment targets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.