ArticleJournal of affective disorders2026
Suicide safety plan engagement: Temporal dynamics and momentary predictors.
Article in Journal of affective disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Suicide safety planning is an evidence-based intervention, yet little is known about when plans are used in daily life or preceding states. Given the documented dynamic nature of suicide ideation, this study examined proximal predictors of safety plan use using intensive longitudinal methods. Fifty-two undergraduate students screened for past-two-week suicide ideation completed a Stanley-Brown safety plan and a 10-day ecological momentary assessment protocol (five prompts/day). Suicide ideation facets (wish to live, wish to die, suicidal desire, suicidal intent), negative affect, perceived stress, and safety plan use were assessed. Lagged generalized linear multilevel models and autoregressive models tested whether within-person elevations predicted subsequent use. Forty-six percent of participants used their safety plan at least once, reporting high perceived helpfulness and likelihood of future use. Lagged suicidal intent (OR = 1.38, p = .034), perceived stress (OR = 3.43, p = .021), and lagged safety plan use (OR = 3.20, p < .001) predicted a greater likelihood of subsequent safety plan use. Wish to live, wish to die, suicidal ambivalence, suicidal desire, and negative affect were not significant. Safety plan use showed modest temporal clustering (ρ = 0.21, SE = 0.02). Safety plan use appeared state-dependent, increasing in response to acute elevations in suicidal intent and perceived stress rather than reflecting a general function of suicidal thinking, highlighting temporally proximal intervention targets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.