ArticleJournal of biomechanics2026
In vivo assessment of the subacromial space during shoulder elevation following acromioclavicular joint reconstruction.
Article in Journal of biomechanics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
High-grade disruptions to the acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) significantly impair scapular function, which may compromise the subacromial space and increase the risk of impingement related pathology. Research has traditionally focused on the minimum distance between the humeral head and undersurface of the acromion, which may not accurately address the space above the supraspinatus footprint. This study aimed to quantify the subacromial space between the anterior acromion and the supraspinatus footprint, as well as the general humeral-acromial spacing during muscle-driven shoulder motion, in individuals who had undergone ACJ reconstruction. Twelve participants with acute unilateral ACJ disruptions, 1 to 3 years post-surgery, were recruited. Each underwent 3D computed tomography combined with biplane video-radiography during abduction, scaption, and flexion. Regions of interest (ROI) were applied to the scapula and humerus surface models representing the supraspinatus footprint and the inferior acromial surface. The minimum 3D Euclidean distances between respective ROIs were then calculated for each movement, along with its precise anatomical location. The surgical limb showed a 0.8 mm (23%) narrower subacromial space above the supraspinatus footprint during abduction compared to the contralateral limb, with the minimum location occurring 3.6 mm more medially on the acromion. Additionally, the minimum general humeral-acromial space was located up to 10.6 mm more posteriorly along the proximal humerus and 4.9 mm more medially on the acromion. These findings demonstrate that bone surface proximities and associated subacromial space can be significantly altered post-surgery following ACJ reconstruction, potentially increasing the risk of repetitive shear and compressive forces on the rotator cuff tendon.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.