GuidelineClinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.)2026
Anatomical Variation Quality Assessment Tool (AVQAT): Structured Guide for Reporting and Assessing the Quality of Anatomical Case Reports.
Guideline in Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Venous thoracic outlet syndrome in a patient with an aberrant subclavius posticus muscle: a case report.Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anatomical variations are common and often clinically important, yet their description frequently relies on isolated case reports or small series with heterogeneous reporting quality. Incomplete documentation of specimen characteristics, inconsistent anatomical definitions and terminology, insufficient description of visualization methods, limited quantitative measurements, and suboptimal figures all reduce reproducibility and limit comparison and data synthesis. To address the lack of an anatomy-specific quality assessment, the Anatomical Variation Quality Assessment Tool (AVQAT) is introduced as a structured instrument intended for authors, reviewers, and editors. AVQAT comprises two sections organized into nine domains. Section A evaluates technical and descriptive quality across six domains: general aspects, specimen characteristics, anatomical definition, methods of visualization, quantitative description and measurements, and quality and use of figures. Section B evaluates interpretative and contextual quality in three domains: differential diagnostic considerations, identification and integration of previous studies, and ethical and regulatory considerations. Each domain contains targeted items that can be assessed systematically using "Yes," "No," or "Not applicable" responses. The tool is designed to complement, not replace, generic case-report guidance by focusing on the specific demands of anatomical documentation and thereby facilitating higher-quality reporting and more reliable evidence synthesis in scoping and systematic reviews.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.