SynthesisPest management science2026
Meta-analysis of corm yield responses to chemical and biological approaches for managing taro leaf blight disease.
Synthesis in Pest management science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTaro leaf blight (TLB), caused by Phytophthora colocasiae, inflicts yield losses of up to 90% and annual economic damage exceeding USD 1.4 billion in West Africa. Despite a growing body of literature on chemical and biological disease management, no quantitative synthesis has compared their efficacy for protecting taro corm yield. This meta-analysis quantified the effects of chemical fungicides and biological control treatments on taro yield.
resultsLiterature searches of Scopus and Google Scholar (December 2024) identified 21 eligible studies published between 1980 and 2022, yielding 168 treatment comparisons (91 chemical, 77 biological) across five countries. A multilevel random-effects meta-analysis with cluster-robust variance estimation (RVE) was applied to account for correlated effect sizes within studies. Chemical treatments produced a large, statistically significant pooled effect (Hedges' g = 1.072, 95% CI: 0.650-1.494, P < 0.001; k = 74 effect sizes from 15 studies). This result was robust across all sensitivity analyses, including outlier removal (g = 0.983), complete-case standard deviations (g = 0.968), and bias adjustment via trim-and-fill (g = 0.653). Multi-component fungicide formulations outperformed single-active-ingredient products, and effect sizes increased modestly over four decades. Biological treatments, based on only six unique studies contributing 73 effect sizes, yielded a non-significant pooled effect under RVE (g = 0.508, 95% CI: -0.497 to 1.514, P = 0.249). Extreme heterogeneity was observed (I
conclusionChemical fungicides provide robust, reproducible yield protection against TLB across geographic regions and experimental conditions. The evidence base for biological control of TLB is currently insufficient to support conclusions about efficacy: the available studies are few, the data are heterogeneous, imputation rates for standard deviations are high, and accounting for study-level clustering eliminates the apparent statistical significance of the pooled estimate. Standardized reporting protocols and targeted trials in major taro-producing regions are needed before biological or integrated management strategies can be recommended on an evidence-based basis. © 2026 Society of Chemical Industry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.