Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42065879›Full record

ArticleJAMA health forum2026

Primary Care Access and the Role of Telemedicine for Traditional Medicare Beneficiaries.

Ishani Ganguli, Nicholas E Daley, Andrew Hicks, Katherine M Morgan, Ateev Mehrotra, David M Cutler, Meredith B Rosenthal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA health forum, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ishani GanguliHarvard University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Nicholas E DaleyDivision of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital Boston, Massachusetts.
Andrew HicksHarvard University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Katherine M MorganHarvard University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Ateev MehrotraBrown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island.
David M CutlerHarvard University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Meredith B RosenthalHarvard University, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Primary care improves population health, yet access is a challenge in the US. It is unclear how primary care use, access, and access disparities have changed since widespread adoption of telemedicine during the pandemic. Objective: To quantify trends in primary care use and determine the role of telemedicine in primary care access and access disparities for traditional Medicare beneficiaries. Design, Setting, and Participants: Serial cross-sectional study using 2017-2023 100% claims and administrative data for traditional Medicare beneficiaries continuously enrolled and alive for the given year. Data were analyzed from October 2024 to July 2025. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary care visits per beneficiary, primary care access (defined as ≥1 virtual or in-person primary care visit in the year), and primary care continuity (Bice-Boxerman Index). Results: Among 258 324 127 person-years from 2017 to 2023, primary care visit rates decreased from 2.54 per person-year in 2017 to 2.27 per person-year in 2023, and access dropped from 61.9% to 59.8%. In 2023, virtual visits comprised 7% of primary care visits and 14% of beneficiaries who accessed primary care used telemedicine to do so. Disparities in access by race, geography, and income increased slightly from 2019 to 2023, and beneficiaries in historically underserved groups by race, geography, and income who accessed primary care were more likely than others to use telemedicine to do so. Primary care continuity decreased from 0.72 in 2019 to 0.65 in 2023; in 2023, continuity was slightly higher for those using telemedicine for primary care than for those who were not. Conclusions and Relevance: This serial cross-sectional study found that across all traditional Medicare beneficiaries, primary care visit rates and access decreased, with virtual visits comprising a small share of previously in-person visits. Access disparities widened while those in underserved groups were more likely than others to use telemedicine for this access. Results suggest that telemedicine plays a small but potentially important role in primary care access.

Indexed as

Access to Primary CareHealth Services AccessibilityMedicarePrimary Health CareTelemedicineAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesDigital HealthFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHumansMaleUnited States

Identifiers

PMID42065879
PMCPMC13135207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.