ArticleHealth economics review2026
Presenting a pragmatic model for evaluating the economic performance of hospitals in Iran based on multi-criteria decision-making.
Article in Health economics review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEvaluating the economic performance of hospitals is crucial for improving efficiency and aligning healthcare services with organizational missions. This study presents an operational model for assessing the economic performance of hospitals in Iran, based on a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approach.
methodsAn expert panel was employed to evaluate and prioritize key economic performance indicators using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Nine primary indicators and four criteria, including validity, alignment with hospital missions, adherence to national accreditation standards, and data availability, were used for prioritization. Pairwise comparison matrices were developed, and consistency ratios (CR) were calculated to ensure accuracy. The final model incorporates normalized scores of indicators to derive the overall economic performance of each hospital.
resultsThe expert panel identified nine key indicators for assessing hospital economic performance. Among these, bed occupancy rate (weight = 0.219), bed turnover rate (0.167), and insurance claim rejection rate (0.141) received the highest priorities. Validity in measuring efficiency and economic performance was the most influential criterion (weight = 0.505), followed by alignment with hospital missions and objectives (0.331). The final weighted model highlights that improvements in bed utilization, patient flow, and insurance claim management have the greatest potential impact on hospitals' economic performance. Sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of the results, as changes in criterion weights did not substantially alter the ranking of the top indicators.
conclusionThe proposed model provides a reliable framework for assessing hospital economic performance in Iran. It highlights key performance indicators that align with organizational goals and economic efficiency. This model can aid hospital administrators in decision-making to improve financial sustainability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.