ArticleNeuroinformatics2026
Diagnostic Classification of Autism Spectrum Disorder in the Frequency Domain Using Resting-State fMRI.
Article in Neuroinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder with problems in social interactions, verbal and non-verbal communication, repetitive behaviors, and limited interests in a person. Considering the challenges in diagnosing ASD based on behavioral symptoms-such as subjectivity, variability among individuals, and overlap with other developmental conditions-it seems necessary to propose computer-aided diagnosis systems (CADS) for ASD. We proposed an age-dependent CADS based on functional connectivity (FC) in the frequency domain for ASD using resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI). Also, the features and classification accuracy obtained in the frequency and time domains were compared. First, preprocessing was performed on the rs-fMRI data. Then, group-independent component analysis (GICA) was used to obtain resting state networks (RSNs). This was followed by obtaining separate components of RSNs for each individual using dual regression. Then, coherence analysis was used to extract the features of FC in the frequency domain between RSNs. To consider the role of age in the classification process, three age groups of children, adolescents, and adults were considered, and feature selection for each age group was applied separately using an embedded approach, in which all classifiers in the Waikato Environment for Knowledge Analysis (WEKA) machine learning platform were used simultaneously. Finally, classification accuracy was obtained for each age group. The proposed CADS was able to classify 95.23% in the children group, 88.1% in the adolescent group, and 92.8% in the adult group. In addition, the frequency bands whose features obtained the most distinction in each age group were identified, highlighting their potential relevance for supporting ASD diagnosis and monitoring rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42065849What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.