ArticleCommunity mental health journal2026
Routine Outcome Changes Associated with Brief Psychological Interventions Delivered by Assistant Psychologists and Trainee Associate Psychology Practitioners in a Crisis Resolution and Home Treatment Team.
Article in Community mental health journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Psychological interventions are recommended for people under Crisis Resolution Home Treatment Teams (CRHTTs). Non-registered psychology roles (Assistant Psychologists (APs) and Trainee Associate Psychological Practitioners (TAPPs)) are potentially both cost and clinically effective for delivering brief interventions in CRHTTs. This study aimed to quantitatively examine routine outcome change associated with two brief, skills-based interventions (the Crisis Toolbox (CTB) and the Emotion Coping Skills (ECS)) delivered by APs and TAPPs in one CRHTT. A retrospective service evaluation of 490 service users who accessed either the CTB or ECS between June 2020 and February 2025 was employed. The Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation - 10 (Core-10) and Mental Health Confidence Scale (MHCS) measures were completed pre- and post- intervention. Paired samples t-tests were conducted and demographics (age, gender, and ethnicity) collected. There was a statistically significant effect in improving scores on both measures at the post-intervention timepoint (CORE-10: 8.636, 95% CI [7.810 to 9.461], t(297) = 20.586, p < .001; MHCS: -13.537, 95% CI [-14.827 to -12.237], t{293) = -20.568, p < .001). This significant effect remained when looking at males and females separately. Asian and Black ethnic groups were underrepresented in the sample compared to local demographics, whilst other ethnic groups showed similar representation. Findings suggest that CTB and ECS may be clinically effective in reducing distress and increasing confidence in coping with mental health challenges for service users. Additionally, this evaluation has highlighted the need for better understanding UK ethnic minority representation in CRHTTs and consideration of possible barriers to access.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42065842What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.