Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42065768›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2026

Trajectories of detailed general movements and their association with one-year developmental outcomes in very preterm, moderate-to-late preterm, and term infants.

Doğan Porsnok, Bilge Nur Yardımcı-Lokmanoğlu, Akmer Mutlu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Doğan PorsnokFaculty of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Developmental and Early Physiotherapy Unit, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey. doganporsnak@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9936-0580
Bilge Nur Yardımcı-LokmanoğluFaculty of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Developmental and Early Physiotherapy Unit, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5090-6658
Akmer MutluFaculty of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Developmental and Early Physiotherapy Unit, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6346-1750

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Trajectories of early spontaneous movements provide valuable insights into developmental outcomes in preterm infants. We aimed to compare the longitudinal trajectory of early spontaneous movements in very preterm (VPT), moderate-to-late preterm (MLP) and term infants, and determine the relationship between early spontaneous movements and one-year developmental outcomes in preterm infants. This prospective longitudinal study included 133 infants, comprising 91 preterm and 42 term infants. Early spontaneous movements were assessed longitudinally according to the infants' ages, using the revised General Movements Assessment (GMA) score sheet, the General Movements Optimality Score-Revised (GMOS-R), and the Motor Optimality Score for 3-to 5-Month-Old Infants-Revised (MOS-R). Developmental outcomes were assessed using the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development-Third Edition (Bayley-III). Two hundred and twenty-four video recordings for GMOS-R and 133 video recordings for MOS-R were evaluated. There was no difference in GMOS-R between VPT and MLP infants in the preterm or term periods (p = 0.343). However, VPT infants exhibited lower GMOS-R (p = 0.001) in the postterm period and lower MOS-R (p = 0.018) in the fidgety period compared to term infants. VPT infants had lower Bayley-III outcomes than MLP infants in the cognitive (p = 0.006), language (p = 0.003), and motor domains (p = 0.004), and lower motor outcome than term infants (p < 0.001). GMOS-R in the preterm or term periods was correlated only with motor outcomes (p = 0.002; r = 0.329), while in the postterm period GMOS-R was correlated with cognitive (p = 0.039; r = 0.222), language (p = 0.045; r = 0.215), and motor (p = 0.001; r = 0.340) outcomes in all preterm infants. MOS-R was also related with cognitive (p < 0.001; r = 0.396), language (p = 0.005; r = 0.301), and motor (p < 0.001; r = 0.457) outcomes.

conclusionThis study supports the concept that VPT infants are at high-risk of developmental problems. Additionally, while the relationship of GMOS-R to developmental outcomes is highlighted, MOS-R is more strongly associated with later developmental outcomes. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Time-based General Movements Assessment through trajectories provide important information to identify infants at high neurodevelopmental risk. WHAT IS NEW: • The General Movements Optimality Score-Revised (GMOS-R) may support early risk stratification in the earliest months of life and is potentially informative for early intervention referrals. However, MOS-R demonstrates stronger overall associations, highlighting its important role in early developmental assessments.

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentDevelopmental DisabilitiesInfant, PrematureFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfantInfant, NewbornLongitudinal StudiesMaleMovementProspective StudiesDevelopmental outcomeEarly spontaneous movementsGeneral movementsOptimality scorePreterm infants

Identifiers

PMID42065768
PMCPMC13135000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.