ArticleRadiology. Imaging cancer2026
Interval Cancers after Negative Screening Contrast-enhanced Mammography.
Article in Radiology. Imaging cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose To determine the interval cancer rate (ICR) after negative screening contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) and compare the characteristics of interval cancers (ICs) with those of CEM screen-detected cancers. Materials and Methods This retrospective, single-institution study included consecutive screening CEM examinations performed from January 2015 through December 2021. ICs diagnosed within 1 year of a negative screening CEM and all CEM screen-detected cancers were identified. Two breast radiologists independently reviewed prior negative CEM examinations to classify ICs as missed, misinterpreted, or occult. Patient- and lesion-level characteristics were compared between ICs and screen-detected cancers using the Wilcoxon rank sum test for continuous variables and the Fisher exact or χ
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.