ReviewNanoscale2026
Cell derived nanovesicles for oral and craniofacial tissue regeneration.
Review in Nanoscale, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Oral and craniofacial diseases represent a significant global public health concern, profoundly impacting patient quality of life and imposing a substantial socioeconomic burden. While cell-based, particularly stem cell-based, regenerative strategies have shown promise in addressing the limitations of conventional therapies, they are also constrained by inherent challenges associated with cell therapy. Instead of relying on whole cells, cell-derived nanovesicles (CDNs), which inherit diverse biological functions from their parent cells, have emerged as a promising frontier in regenerative medicine. CDNs play a pivotal role in restoring microenvironmental homeostasis and modulating inflammation, thereby promoting angiogenesis and osteogenesis to support effective tissue regeneration. Furthermore, the therapeutic efficacy of CDNs can be enhanced through cell pretreatment and bioengineering strategies, such as cargo loading and surface modification. Owing to their ability to penetrate biological barriers, exhibit prolonged circulation, and achieve tissue-specific targeting, CDNs represent an advantageous drug delivery platform. Indeed, the development of engineered CDNs and hybrid composite systems has yielded excellent therapeutic outcomes by enhancing the precision and efficiency of drug delivery. This review systematically categorizes four major classes of CDNs, including exosomes (Exos), exosome mimetics (EMs), cell membrane nanovesicles (mNVs), and apoptotic extracellular vesicles (ApoEVs), evaluating their roles in treating craniofacial bone defects, osteoporosis, periodontitis, and dentin-pulp complex regeneration. Finally, we highlight the clinical potential of CDN-based therapies and outline future research directions for their application in oral and craniofacial tissue regeneration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.