ArticleJournal of vision2026
The effect of flashing lights on speed perception for lateral motion and motion in depth.
Article in Journal of vision, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Flashing lights are commonly used to enhance visibility and attract attention, but they may influence other perceptual processes such as localization, distance estimation, and motion perception. In this study, we investigated how flashing affects speed perception for stimuli moving laterally and in-depth. On each trial, observers viewed a moving white dot on a stereoscopic display that traveled either laterally or in-depth at one of several speeds (ranging from about 4-17 cm/s) and under one of three flashing conditions (none, 3 Hz, or 6 Hz). During part of the trajectory, the dot was occluded and its speed was perturbed. Speed perception was probed by asking observers to report whether the dot sped up or slowed down during occlusion. Replicating prior findings, speeds for motion-in-depth were generally underestimated relative to lateral motion, especially at higher stimulus speeds. Notably, this motion-in-depth underestimation bias was reduced when the stimulus was flashing. A follow up exploratory analysis on motion-in-depth perception also showed consistent differences between motion toward and away from the observer across both the continuous and flashing conditions. These findings contribute to our understanding of the utility of flashing lights for visual communication and suggest that flashing may specifically alter speed perception for motion-in-depth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.