Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42065414›Full record

ArticleFaraday discussions2026

Interpretable Bayesian optimization for catalyst discovery.

Akhil S Nair, Lucas Foppa, Matthias Scheffler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Faraday discussions, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Akhil S NairThe NOMAD Laboratory at the Fritz Haber Institute of the Max Planck Society, Faradayweg 4-6, D-14195 Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5723-3970
Lucas FoppaThe NOMAD Laboratory at the Fritz Haber Institute of the Max Planck Society, Faradayweg 4-6, D-14195 Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3002-062X
Matthias SchefflerThe NOMAD Laboratory at the Fritz Haber Institute of the Max Planck Society, Faradayweg 4-6, D-14195 Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bayesian optimization (BO) efficiently explores vast design spaces using probabilistic surrogate models, enabling the guided discovery of materials with desired properties. However, most BO frameworks rely on the knowledge of a few key physical parameters (features) correlated with the materials property of interest. This is a challenge in heterogeneous catalysis, where the material properties are governed by an intricate interplay of multiple physical processes, and the mentioned parameters are typically unknown. Here, we introduce the Sparse Adaptive Representation-based Bayesian Optimization (SARBO) framework that utilizes the sure independence screening and sparsifying operator (SISSO) symbolic-regression method for on-the-fly selection of key physical parameters correlated with materials properties during BO. Crucially, SISSO takes into account nonlinear relationships and interactions between multiple parameters when selecting key features. We demonstrate that SARBO enables efficient navigation of the materials spaces and outperforms widely used feature-selection approaches for the simulated discovery of single- and dual-atom alloy surface sites capable of activating CO

Identifiers

PMID42065414
PMCPMC13127247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.