ReviewEFORT open reviews2026
'THA for DDH: replacement principles and techniques - femoral side'.
Review in EFORT open reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) remains a leading cause of early hip osteoarthritis and poses considerable technical challenges during total hip arthroplasty. Existing classification systems focus on the abnormal relationship between the femoral head and the acetabulum without emphasising the femoral morphological variations, which are equally significant in surgical planning. Dysplastic femora often demonstrate excessive neck anteversion, variable neck-shaft angles, reduced offset, and metaphyseal-diaphyseal mismatch with narrow intramedullary canals. These anatomical variations often compromise the abductor mechanism and alter hip biomechanics. Thorough preoperative planning is crucial and should include the evaluation of leg-length discrepancy, reconstruction of the hip centre of rotation, assessment of femoral version and canal morphology, implant selection, and consideration of femoral shortening osteotomy. Computed tomography-based planning can enhance preoperative planning in complex cases. Both cemented and cementless stems align with positive findings in DDH patients. Cemented stems enable reliable version control, decrease intraoperative fracture risk, and may be beneficial for patients with poor bone quality. In mild cases, most uncemented stems are suitable. More severe deformities necessitate specialised implant designs with conical fluted stems, which provide strong fixation and excellent long-term survivorship. Modular and custom-made options also achieve favourable outcomes in high-grade deformities. Femoral shortening osteotomies are often needed to restore biomechanics, correct abnormal version, and prevent nerve injury during reduction. The subtrochanteric osteotomy has been linked with excellent results in treating severe DDH. High-quality research is essential to deepen our understanding of proximal femur morphological abnormalities and to enhance surgical results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.