Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42065226›Full record

ReviewEFORT open reviews2026

'THA for DDH: replacement principles and techniques - femoral side'.

Konstantinos Konstantinidis, Dimitrios Grammatikopoulos, Eustathios Kenanidis, Alexander Maslaris, Pedro Dantas, Eleftherios Tsiridis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EFORT open reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Konstantinos KonstantinidisAcademic Orthopaedic Department, Papageorgiou General Hospital, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-5836-9572
Dimitrios GrammatikopoulosAcademic Orthopaedic Department, Papageorgiou General Hospital, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-3840-6335
Eustathios KenanidisAcademic Orthopaedic Department, Papageorgiou General Hospital, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9517-1600
Alexander MaslarisAcademic Orthopaedic Department, Papageorgiou General Hospital, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3120-2057
Pedro DantasDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital CUF Descobertas, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4010-0327
Eleftherios TsiridisAcademic Orthopaedic Department, Papageorgiou General Hospital, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8278-1653

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) remains a leading cause of early hip osteoarthritis and poses considerable technical challenges during total hip arthroplasty. Existing classification systems focus on the abnormal relationship between the femoral head and the acetabulum without emphasising the femoral morphological variations, which are equally significant in surgical planning. Dysplastic femora often demonstrate excessive neck anteversion, variable neck-shaft angles, reduced offset, and metaphyseal-diaphyseal mismatch with narrow intramedullary canals. These anatomical variations often compromise the abductor mechanism and alter hip biomechanics. Thorough preoperative planning is crucial and should include the evaluation of leg-length discrepancy, reconstruction of the hip centre of rotation, assessment of femoral version and canal morphology, implant selection, and consideration of femoral shortening osteotomy. Computed tomography-based planning can enhance preoperative planning in complex cases. Both cemented and cementless stems align with positive findings in DDH patients. Cemented stems enable reliable version control, decrease intraoperative fracture risk, and may be beneficial for patients with poor bone quality. In mild cases, most uncemented stems are suitable. More severe deformities necessitate specialised implant designs with conical fluted stems, which provide strong fixation and excellent long-term survivorship. Modular and custom-made options also achieve favourable outcomes in high-grade deformities. Femoral shortening osteotomies are often needed to restore biomechanics, correct abnormal version, and prevent nerve injury during reduction. The subtrochanteric osteotomy has been linked with excellent results in treating severe DDH. High-quality research is essential to deepen our understanding of proximal femur morphological abnormalities and to enhance surgical results.

Indexed as

Crowe classificationDDHdevelopmental dysplasia of the hipdysplastic hipsfemoral stemsHartofilakidis classificationsubtrochanteric osteotomytotal hip arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID42065226
PMCPMC13150332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.