Observational studyMedicine2026
Building and validating a stigma prediction model for overweight and obese patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS): A observational study.
Observational study in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This observational study was designed to establish and validate a stigma prediction model for patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). The stigma risk scoring table for overweight and obese patients with PCOS has good predictive ability. When an overweight or obese patient with PCOS presents, the prediction model allows clinic staff to rapidly grade hirsutism, acne, and acanthosis, determine fertility desire, and quantify anxiety. Low-risk patients then receive standard care, whereas high-risk patients receive precision interventions. Unlike the traditional approach, this clinical prediction model incorporates not only laboratory values but also body-image concerns and psychological well-being, providing more comprehensive management for women with PCOS. To preliminarily explore the associations among stigma, PCOS signs, anxiety, and depression. A total of 124 overweight and obese patients with PCOS were selected using convenience sampling. The patients in the order of clinic visit time were divided into a modeling set and a validation set at a ratio of 3:1. Univariate analysis was first performed, normally distributed continuous variables were compared using t-tests, non-normally distributed continuous variables with nonparametric rank-sum tests, and categorical variables with χ2 tests. Independent risk factors for stigma were identified using multivariable logistic regression, and a nomogram was constructed. The model's discrimination and calibration were evaluated with the receiver operating characteristic curve and calibration curve. Internal validation was subsequently conducted on the validation data set to assess model performance comprehensively. Hirsutism (odds ratio [OR]=0.075, 95%Cl: 0.015-0.368) , acne (OR=0.210, 95%Cl: 0.050-0.878) , acanthosis nigricans (OR=0.184, 95%Cl: 0.044-0.073) , fertility requirements (OR=0.212, 95%Cl: 0.051-0.890) , and anxiety (OR=1.217, 95%Cl: 1.074-1.378) were independent influencing factors for stigma in these patients (P < .05). The constructed prediction model also demonstrated good predictive ability, with area under the curve values of 0.941 and 0.803 for the modeling and validation sets, respectively. Internal validation using 1000 bootstrap resamples revealed a mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve area under the curve of 0.941.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.