Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42065202›Full record

ReviewMedicine2026

A comprehensive review of the clinical progress of esketamine: From anesthesia to antidepressant therapy.

Hai-Lin Hu, Qi-Zhou Huang, Ping-Xia Xie

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hai-Lin HuDepartment of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, Guizhou, China.
Qi-Zhou HuangDepartment of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, Guizhou, China.
Ping-Xia XieDepartment of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, Guizhou, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9782-1726

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Esketamine, the S-enantiomer of ketamine, has emerged as a rapid-acting antidepressant with unique mechanisms. This narrative review synthesizes current evidence on its clinical applications, safety, and regulatory status based on peer-reviewed literature published between January 2000 and March 2024, searched in PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. Esketamine exerts its effects primarily through noncompetitive antagonism of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors, leading to rapid modulation of glutamatergic signaling and neuroplasticity. In anesthesia, it provides effective sedation with minimal respiratory depression. In psychiatry, intravenous and intranasal esketamine have demonstrated rapid antidepressant effects in treatment-resistant depression, with response rates of 50% to 70% within 24 hours. However, long-term safety data remain limited, and concerns persist regarding dissociative symptoms, cognitive impairment, and abuse potential. Regulatory approvals vary: the Food and Drug Administration approved intranasal esketamine for treatment-resistant depression in 2019, while European and Asian countries have adopted differing restrictions. Esketamine represents a paradigm shift in depression treatment, but its use requires careful patient selection, monitoring, and risk management. Future research should focus on head-to-head comparisons with other rapid-acting interventions, long-term outcomes, and integration into stepped-care models.

Indexed as

Antidepressive AgentsDepressive Disorder, Treatment-ResistantKetamineAnesthesiaHumansReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateAntidepressive AgentsEsketamineKetamineReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateanesthesiaantidepressantdepressionEsketamineNMDA receptorsuicidal ideationtreatment-resistant depression

Identifiers

PMID42065202
PMCPMC13138482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.