ArticleMedicine2026
Impact of preoperative femoral vein ultrasound localization on puncture success and procedural complications during radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: A multicenter study.
Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Safe and accurate femoral venous access is fundamental to the success of radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) for atrial fibrillation (AF), particularly under uninterrupted anticoagulation, where vascular injury may lead to amplified bleeding and thrombotic risk. Conventional landmark-based puncture is limited by anatomical variability, whereas ultrasound guidance has shown potential to enhance puncture safety. This multicenter retrospective cohort study included 300 AF patients undergoing RFCA across 3 tertiary hospitals from September 2024 to December 2025 under uninterrupted anticoagulation. Patients were assigned to a preprocedural ultrasound localization group (n = 150) or a conventional anatomical landmark group (n = 150). Baseline characteristics were compared, and puncture efficiency, intraoperative events, puncture-related complications, operative metrics, postoperative recovery, and additional intervention requirements were evaluated. Multivariable logistic regression was used to adjust for confounders. Preprocedural ultrasound markedly improved puncture performance, achieving a higher first-attempt success rate (87.3% vs 59.3%, P <.001), fewer attempts (1.3 ± 0.6 vs 2.4 ± 1.1, P <.001), and shorter puncture time (4.6 ± 1.2 vs 6.8 ± 1.5 minutes, P <.001). Ultrasound-detected anatomical variations in 44% of patients, including venous deviation, duplication, stenosis, and venous-arterial overlap. Safety outcomes favored the ultrasound group, showing reduced arterial mispuncture (2.7% vs 14.0%), blood vessel spasm (3.3% vs 11.3%), and abnormal catheter path events (2.0% vs 11.3%) (all P <.01). Puncture-related complications were significantly decreased, including overall hematoma (10.0% vs 31.3%), persistent oozing (6.7% vs 17.3%), infection (0.7% vs 4.7%), deep vein thrombosis (2.0% vs 7.3%), pseudoaneurysm (0% vs 4.0%), and arteriovenous fistula (0.7% vs 4.7%) (all P <.05). Ultrasound localization also reduced operative difficulty scores (1.9 ± 0.8 vs 3.2 ± 1.1, P <.001) and shortened total procedural duration (118.7 ± 25.4 vs 133.3 ± 30.4 minutes, P <.001). Postoperative pain at 2 and 24 hours was significantly lower, and bed rest time was shorter, though length of stay was similar between groups. Additional interventions - extended compression, hematoma drainage, and anticoagulation adjustment - were markedly less frequent in the ultrasound group (overall 4.7% vs 21.3%, P <.001). Preprocedural femoral venous ultrasound localization significantly enhances puncture accuracy, reduces vascular complications, improves procedural efficiency, and accelerates postoperative recovery in AF patients undergoing RFCA under uninterrupted anticoagulation. These findings support incorporating ultrasound-based localization into routine preprocedural assessment to optimize the safety and quality of electrophysiological interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.